Hi all,
long I have been thinking about proper rendering of math in the HTML form
of R documentation. As you know, you can write \eqn{} in your .Rd files and
this is nicely rendered into the PDF Reference manual of the package with
the aid of TeX. However, that is not the case in the aforementione
. I propose (in line with mathjaxr authors) that mathjax is
pretty good candidate for it.
Once more I am sorry for the ambiguity in my language.
Best,
Jan Netik
Dne čt 27. 5. 2021 22:15 uživatel Duncan Murdoch
napsal:
> On 27/05/2021 2:34 p.m., Jan Netík wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
Hello everyone,
glad to see the progress on this! It would be a major advancement in the
user experience of using our beloved _statistical_ language and
environment. I have brought the topic a year ago or so here and Simon
Urbanek offered a "hack" which I have implemented in the package many use
t
Hello Jan,
I have seen many packages that implemented dependencies "extraction" on
their own for internal purposes and today I was doing exactly that for
mine. It's not a big deal using read.dcf on DESCRIPTION. It was sufficient
for me, but I had to take care of some \n chars (the overall returned
ack in any new R session.
Sadly, I cannot provide any reproducible example as I am completely unaware
of the cause and even I cannot reproduce this issue outside of the server.
Any insights on how this issue could have started would be highly
appreciated.
Best regards,
Jan
rse-dependencies
> as well since they may include cached values in their namespaces, so the
> easiest is to make sure you re-install all packages.
>
> Cheers,
> Simon
>
>
> > On Oct 3, 2023, at 4:18 AM, Jan Netík wrote:
> >
> > Hello R-devel,
> &g
Hello,
I have a server with R 3.6.3 installed and I struggled a bit with
updating several R packages that utilizes some new syntax introduced in R
4.1.0, such as the native pipe |> or function definition shorthand \(x) ...
The thing is that these packages states "Depends: R (>= 3.6.0)" and pass R
