ttp://www.stat.ufl.edu/~presnell/
>
> "We don't think that the popularity of an error makes it the truth."
>-- Richard Stallman
>
> ______
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
______
> R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>
-
Frank Harrell
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University
--
View this message in context:
http://r.789695.n4.na
Terry Therneau has been very helpful on r-help but we can't figure out
what change in R in the past months made extra columns appear in
model.matrix when the terms object is subsetted to remove stratification
factors in a Cox model. Terry has changed his logic in the survival
package to avoid
To me it boils down to one simple question: is an update to a package on
CRAN more likely to (1) fix a bug, (2) introduce a bug or downward
incompatibility, or (3) add a new feature or fix a compatibility problem
without introducing a bug? I think the probability of (1) | (3) is much
greater t
I am thinking about adding several geom and stat extensions to ggplot2
in the Hmisc package. To do this requires using non-exported ggplot2
functions as discussed in
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/18108406/creating-a-custom-stat-object-in-ggplot2
If I use the needed ggplot2::: notation the
Today's GNU R tutorial in
http://how-to.linuxcareer.com/a-quick-gnu-r-tutorial-to-statistical-models-and-graphics
points out how bad statistical practice is being further perpetuated, by
virtue of "significance stars" still being the default in printed output
from lm models.
Given that, one might argue that R should do what it
> can to help users engage in good statistical practice. I think this was
> Frank's point.
>
> Norm
>
> __
> R-devel@
> mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
-
Frank Harre
gt;>
>> [apologies for snipping context: "gmane made me do it"]
>>
>> __
>>
> R-devel@
> mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>
>
> ___
But when I do latex(anova(fit)) I get an
invocation of latex.default.
I have tried using "anova.rms" and `anova.rms` in S3method() to no avail.
Any help appreciated. I'm using R 2.15.3
Frank
-
Frank Harrell
Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University
--
View this
. rms has
import(Hmisc) in NAMESPACE and is loaded before quantreg, hence the
conflict. How do I make the generic from Hmisc take precedence?
Thanks
Frank
Frank Harrell wrote
> I have updated the rms package to extensively use NAMESPACE. I cannot get
> certain S3 methods to dispatch. For e
Thank you very much Peter. That did the trick.
Frank
Peter Dalgaard-2 wrote
> On Apr 24, 2013, at 15:59 , Frank Harrell wrote:
>
>> I found that package quantreg has created a new generic for latex() [I
>> wish
>> it hadn't; this has been a generic in Hmisc for
Ivan thank you very much for the exceptionally clear explanations. I’m
convinced.
Frank
> On Oct 25, 2024, at 4:49 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> В Fri, 25 Oct 2024 15:03:54 -0500
> f...@fharrell.com пишет:
>
>> Now I find that I can get rid of init.c, and change NAMESPACE to use
>> useDynLib(p
12 matches
Mail list logo