I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R
4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0.
However, currently CRAN has
Package: Matrix
Version: 1.6-5
Priority: recommended
Depends: R (>= 3.5.0), methods
...
(plus another version for R >= 4.5.0 only).
Which has some weird consequences, e.g. if I
> Gábor Csárdi
> on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:55:36 +0200 writes:
> I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R
> 4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0.
Yes, it *is* available from CRAN: You can see it when looking into the
4.4.0/ , specifically the
4.4.0/Recomm
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024, at 11:32 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Gábor Csárdi
>> on Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:55:36 +0200 writes:
>
> > I don't know if this is a bug, but it is certainly weird. AFAICT R
> > 4.4.0 has Matrix 1.7-0.
>
> Yes, it *is* available from CRAN: You can see it when
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:32:59 +0200
Martin Maechler wrote:
> Finally, I'd think it definitely would be nice for
> install.packages("Matrix") to automatically get the correct
> Matrix version from CRAN ... so we (R-core) would be grateful
> for a patch to install.packages() to achieve this
Since t
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 1:06 PM Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:32:59 +0200
> Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> > Finally, I'd think it definitely would be nice for
> > install.packages("Matrix") to automatically get the correct
> > Matrix version from CRAN ... so we (R-core) would be grat
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:15:47 +0200
Gábor Csárdi wrote:
> That's not how this worked in the past AFAIR. Simply, the packages in
> the x.y.z/Recommended directories were included in
> src/contrib/PACKAGES*, metadata, with the correct R version
> dependencies, in the correct order, so that `install.
Everyone, take a deep breath - there have been many disruptions in last few
days - some obvious, others associated with the R release and the BioC
disruptions on CRAN, so there is no need to panic and start devising
"solutions" for issues that are temporary. Things are being sorted out and some
