I just saw this
r85704 | hornik | 2023-12-19 00:33:07 -0600 (Tue, 19 Dec 2023) | 1 line
Changed paths:
M /trunk/doc/NEWS.Rd
M /trunk/src/library/base/R/matrix.R
M /trunk/src/library/base/man/nrow.Rd
M /trunk/src/li
On 04/02/2024 19:41, Holger Hoefling wrote:
Hi,
I wanted to ask if people have good advice on how to debug M1Mac package
check errors when you don´t have a Mac? Is a cloud machine the best option
or is there something else?
I presumed this was about a CRAN package, possibly hdf5r which has a
M1mac numerical issues should be rare, but when they do pop up they can be
disconcerting.
The following little script reveals what happens with no extended precision. A
few months
ago I built this into a "package" and used
https://mac.r-project.org/macbuilder/submit.html
to run it, getting the
Thanks. Workarounds are interesting but... what's the point of the NOTE
in the first place?
H.
On 2/4/24 09:07, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 04/02/2024 10:55 a.m., Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E] via R-devel
> wrote:
>> Well you can see that yeast is exactly weekday you have. The way out
>> is t
The note refers to the fact that the function named ‘fun’ appears to be defined
in two different ways.
From: Hervé Pagès
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:17 PM
To: Duncan Murdoch ; Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E]
; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Rd] NOTE: multiple local function
Because functions get called and therefore, the calling sequence matters. It’s
just protecting you from yourself, but as someone pointed out, there’s a way to
silence such notes.
G
From: Hervé Pagès
Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:40 PM
To: Izmirlian, Grant (NIH/NCI) [E] ; Duncan Murdoch
;
On 06/02/2024 2:17 p.m., Hervé Pagès wrote:
Thanks. Workarounds are interesting but... what's the point of the NOTE
in the first place?
Creating a function that can't be called could be an error. Presumably
you are careful and never try to call it with the wrong signature, but
the check code
Here's a dummy example that I think illustrates the problem:
toto <- function() {
if (runif(1) < 0.5)
function(a) a
else
function(a,b) a+b
}
> fcn <- toto()
> fcn(1,2)
[1] 3
> fcn <- toto()
> fcn(1,2)
[1] 3
> fcn <- toto()
> fcn(1,2)
Error in fcn(1, 2) : unused argument (2)
How can y
The SO post https://stackoverflow.com/q/77943180 tried to call
globalCallingHandlers() from a function, and it failed with the error
message "should not be called with handlers on the stack". A much
simpler illustration of the same error comes from this line:
try(globalCallingHandlers(warni
I went looking and found this in codetools, where it's been for 20 years
https://gitlab.com/luke-tierney/codetools/-/blame/master/R/codetools.R?ref_type=heads#L951
I think the call stack in codetools is checkUsagePackage -> checkUsageEnv ->
checkUsage, and these are similarly established. The ca
> On 7/02/2024, at 5:06 AM, Prof Brian Ripley via R-devel
> wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2024 19:41, Holger Hoefling wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I wanted to ask if people have good advice on how to debug M1Mac package
>> check errors when you don´t have a Mac? Is a cloud machine the best option
>> or is there so
11 matches
Mail list logo
