Re: [Rd] c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?

> Mikael Jagan > on Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:13:18 -0500 writes: > So, to summarize, the open questions are: > (1) Should as.complex(NA_character_) give complex(r=NA_real_, i=0) > instead of NA_complex_? > (2) Should the first argument in c(NA, x) and c(NA_integer_, x),

Re: [Rd] New syntax for positional-only function parameters?

Hi Mikko, > Given the prevalence of the issue, is this something that you would see as > worth pursuing for R? Could you give a little more detail on this, potentially with an example of the collisions you�re referring to (and maybe an example that throws an error and/or does something unexpec

Re: [Rd] c(NA, 0+1i) not the same as c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i)?

On 2023-11-09 3:13 am, Martin Maechler wrote: Mikael Jagan on Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:13:18 -0500 writes: > So, to summarize, the open questions are: > (1) Should as.complex(NA_character_) give complex(r=NA_real_, i=0) > instead of NA_complex_? > (2) Should the first arg