> Gustavo Zapata Wainberg
> on Mon, 3 May 2021 20:48:49 +0200 writes:
> Hi!
> I'm wrinting this post because there is an inconsistency
> when median() is calculated for even or odd vectors. For
> odd vectors, attributes (such as labels added with Hmisc)
> are kept
I'm on Linux (Ubuntu 18.04). How do I check an R build when using
--without-recommended-packages? 'make check' assumes 'recommended'
packages are installed, so that fails without them available.
DETAILS:
When I build R from source without 'recommended' packages:
curl -O https://cran.r-project.or
On 4 May 2021 at 09:31, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
| I'm on Linux (Ubuntu 18.04). How do I check an R build when using
| --without-recommended-packages? 'make check' assumes 'recommended'
| packages are installed, so that fails without them available.
[...]
| BTW, isn't this a bug? Shouldn't this
Thanks, but I don't understand. That's what I usually do when I build
R with 'recommended' packages. But here, I explicitly do *not* want
to build and install 'recommended' packages with the R installation.
So, I'm going down the --without-recommended-packages path on purpose
and I'm looking for a
On 4 May 2021 at 11:07, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
| Thanks, but I don't understand. That's what I usually do when I build
| R with 'recommended' packages. But here, I explicitly do *not* want
| to build and install 'recommended' packages with the R installation.
| So, I'm going down the --without-
FWIW,
$ ./configure --help
...
--with-recommended-packages
use/install recommended R packages [yes]
/Henrik
On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:17 AM Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
>
> On 4 May 2021 at 11:07, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
> | Thanks, but I don't understand. That's what
On 4 May 2021 at 11:25, Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
| FWIW,
|
| $ ./configure --help
| ...
| --with-recommended-packages
| use/install recommended R packages [yes]
Of course. But look at the verb in your Subject: no optionality _in testing_
there.
You obviously need to
Two questions to R Core:
1. Is R designed so that 'recommended' packages are optional, or
should that be considered uncharted territories?
2. Can such an R build/installation be validated using existing check methods?
--
Dirk, it's not clear to me whether you know for sure, or you draw
conclus
Hi Henrik,
A couple of things. Firstly, so far asI have ever heard, it's valid that a
package have hard dependencies in its tests for packages listed only in
Suggests. In fact, that is one of the stated purposes of Suggests. An
argument could be made, I suppose, that the base packages should be u
Sorry if this has been pointed out already, but some relevant text
from
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#Suggested-packages
> Note that someone wanting to run the examples/tests/vignettes may not
have a suggested package available (and it may not even be possib
On 4 May 2021 at 14:10, Gabriel Becker wrote:
| A couple of things. Firstly, so far asI have ever heard, it's valid that a
| package have hard dependencies in its tests for packages listed only in
| Suggests. In fact, that is one of the stated purposes of Suggests. An
| argument could be made, I
Hmm, that's fair enough Ben, I stand corrected. I will say that this seems
to be a pretty "soft" recommendation, as these things go, given that it
isn't tested for by R CMD check, including with the -as-cran extensions. In
principle, it seems like it could be, similar checks are made in package
co
12 matches
Mail list logo
