> Martin Maechler
> on Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:29:58 +0100 writes:
> Martin Maechler
> on Tue, 1 Dec 2020 10:31:36 +0100 writes:
> Bill Dunlap
> on Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:41:54 -0800 writes:
>>> To make the comparison more complete,
>>> all.equal.environmen
Just saw this on the R-devel news:
R now provides a simple native pipe syntax ‘|>’ as well as a shorthand
notation for creating functions, e.g. ‘\(x) x + 1’ is parsed as
‘function(x) x + 1’. The pipe implementation as a syntax transformation
was motivated by suggestions from Jim Hester and Li
> Error: function '::' not supported in RHS call of a pipe
To me, this error looks much more friendly than magrittr's error.
Some of them got too used to specify functions without (). This
is OK until they use `::`, but when they need to use it, it takes
hours to figure out why
mtcars %>% base::
On 04/12/2020 8:13 a.m., Hiroaki Yutani wrote:
Error: function '::' not supported in RHS call of a pipe
To me, this error looks much more friendly than magrittr's error.
Some of them got too used to specify functions without (). This
is OK until they use `::`, but when they need to use it, it
On 12/4/20 3:05 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
...
It's tempting to suggest it should allow something like
mtcars |> subset(cyl == 4) |> lm(mpg ~ disp, data = .)
which would be expanded to something equivalent to the other versions:
but that makes it quite a bit more complicated. (Maybe _ or
Am 04.12.20 um 15:05 schrieb Duncan Murdoch:
> On 04/12/2020 8:13 a.m., Hiroaki Yutani wrote:
>>> Error: function '::' not supported in RHS call of a pipe
>>
>> To me, this error looks much more friendly than magrittr's error.
>> Some of them got too used to specify functions without (). This
>>
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 7:35 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>
> On 04/12/2020 8:13 a.m., Hiroaki Yutani wrote:
> >> Error: function '::' not supported in RHS call of a pipe
> >
> > To me, this error looks much more friendly than magrittr's error.
> > Some of them got too used to specify functions witho
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Dénes Tóth wrote:
On 12/4/20 3:05 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
...
It's tempting to suggest it should allow something like
mtcars |> subset(cyl == 4) |> lm(mpg ~ disp, data = .)
which would be expanded to something equivalent to the other versions: but
that makes it qui
On 04/12/2020 12:06 p.m., Deepayan Sarkar wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 7:35 PM Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 04/12/2020 8:13 a.m., Hiroaki Yutani wrote:
Error: function '::' not supported in RHS call of a pipe
To me, this error looks much more friendly than magrittr's error.
Some of them got
On 04/12/2020 2:26 p.m., luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Dénes Tóth wrote:
On 12/4/20 3:05 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
...
It's tempting to suggest it should allow something like
mtcars |> subset(cyl == 4) |> lm(mpg ~ disp, data = .)
which would be expanded to something
On Sat, 5 Dec 2020, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 04/12/2020 2:26 p.m., luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020, Dénes Tóth wrote:
On 12/4/20 3:05 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
...
It's tempting to suggest it should allow something like
mtcars |> subset(cyl == 4) |> lm(mpg ~ disp, dat
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 20:11:17 -0600 (CST)
luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
> We did try a number of variations; the code is in the R-syntax branch.
> At the root of that branch are two .md files with some notes as of
> around useR20.
Thanks for the information!
Can I make a suggestion? If the variati
12 matches
Mail list logo
