Re: [Rd] New R function is.nana = is.na & !is.nan

2020-01-02 Thread Tomas Kalibera
Please note that ?NaN says "Computations involving ‘NaN’ will return ‘NaN’ or perhaps ‘NA’: which of those two is not guaranteed and may depend on the R platform (since compilers may re-order computations)." It is not reliable to depend on the distinction between NA and (non-NA) NaN. Part of

[Rd] Bug/unhelpful error message when rbinding data frames containing data frame columns

2020-01-02 Thread Antoine Fabri
Dear rdevel, See the example below : x <- data.frame(a=1) x$b <- data.frame(z=1) y <- x rbind(x,y) # Error in `.rowNamesDF<-`(x, value = value) : # duplicate 'row.names' are not allowed # In addition: Warning message: # non-unique value when setting 'row.names': ‘1’ I believe, that either it