I'm sorry, I'm an idiot for not noticing this. That's what happens when you
have been stuck in configure/make hell for a while.
Best,
Kasper
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 10:54 PM Simon Urbanek
wrote:
> Kasper,
>
> I haven’t checked in depth, so just to clarify: you *are* setting
> CXX11=g++ so it is
Dear all,
I just stumbled upon some behavior of the == operator which is at least
somewhat inconsistent.
R version 3.6.1 (2019-07-05) -- "Action of the Toes"
Copyright (C) 2019 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
Platform: x86_64-w64-mingw32/x64 (64-bit)
> list(a=1:3, b=LETTERS[1:3]) ==
Hi,
I've found the answers to my questions:
1. For sort function, here are some macros defined in Rinternal.h:
/* ALTREP sorting support */
enum {SORTED_DECR_NA_1ST = -2,
SORTED_DECR = -1,
UNKNOWN_SORTEDNESS = INT_MIN, /*INT_MIN is NA_INTEGER! */
SORTED_INCR = 1,
SORTED_IN
https://builder.r-hub.io/
El martes, 3 de septiembre de 2019, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel <
r-devel@r-project.org> escribió:
> I remember there was advice about a server that one could use for reverse
> dependency
> checks, but I forgot to write it down. (Or I did save the info and for
On Tue, 3 Sep 2019 at 14:53, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel
wrote:
>
> I remember there was advice about a server that one could use for reverse
> dependency
> checks, but I forgot to write it down. (Or I did save the info and forgot
> where I saved
> it...) I have been doing the check
