Re: [Rd] Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data

2017-11-28 Thread Arie ten Cate
Since the three posters agree (only) that there is a bug, I propose to file it as a bug, which is the least we can do now. There is more to it: the only other case of a change in the Reference Manual which I know of, is also about the weights option! This is in coxph. The Reference Manual version

Re: [Rd] Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data

2017-11-28 Thread peter dalgaard
It's on my todo list (for R-devel, it is not _that_ important), other things just keep taking priority... -pd > On 28 Nov 2017, at 09:29 , Arie ten Cate wrote: > > Since the three posters agree (only) that there is a bug, I propose to > file it as a bug, which is the least we can do now. > >

[Rd] Height not set properly in grDevices::jpeg() with type = "cairo"

2017-11-28 Thread Marius
Hi, I have been having issues producing plots in JPEG format, using type = "cairo" to get better anti-aliasing. When trying to set the physical size with units = "cm" or units = "mm", the width is set correctly but the height is not - it looks like the height is simply treated as pixels regardless

Re: [Rd] Discourage the weights= option of lm with summarized data

2017-11-28 Thread peter dalgaard
My local R-devel version now has (in ?lm) Non-‘NULL’ ‘weights’ can be used to indicate that different observations have different variances (with the values in ‘weights’ being inversely proportional to the variances); or equivalently, when the elements of ‘weights’ are positive