Thanks for the answers,
I’m aware of the ‘.’ option, just wanted to give a very simple example.
But the lapply ‘…' parameter use has eluded me and thanks for enlightening me.
What do you mean by messing up the call stack. As far as I understand it,
piping should translate into same code as dee
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Antonin Klima wrote:
> Thanks for the answers,
>
> I’m aware of the ‘.’ option, just wanted to give a very simple example.
>
> But the lapply ‘…' parameter use has eluded me and thanks for enlightening me.
>
> What do you mean by messing up the call stack. As far as
> There are tradeoffs. As demonstrated above, the pipe is clearly
> inferior in that it is doing a lot of complicated stuff under the
> hood, and when you try to traceback() through the call stack you have
> to sift through all that complicated stuff. That's a pretty big
> drawback in my opinion.
