I am raising this again.
With
z <- complex(real = c(0,NaN,NaN), imaginary = c(NA,NA,0)) ,
results of
sapply(z, match, table = z)
and
match(z, z)
are different in R 3.4.0 alpha. I think they should be the same.
I suggest changing 'cequal' in unique.c such that a complex number that has
both NA an
On 03/31/2017 10:14 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
From ?NA
Numerical computations using ‘NA’ will normally result in ‘NA’: a
possible exception is where ‘NaN’ is also involved, in which case
either might result.
and ?NaN
Computations involving ‘NaN’ will return ‘NaN’ or perh
