> Martin Maechler
> on Tue, 13 Sep 2016 18:33:35 +0200 writes:
> Suharto Anggono Suharto Anggono via R-devel
> on Fri, 2 Sep 2016 16:10:00 + writes:
>> I am basically fine with the change.
>> How about using just the following?
>> if(!is.character(exclude
Since there has been a recent tweak to the functionality of
Sys.setFileTime() I thought it might be an opportune time to ask a question
regarding the decision to set both access and modification times
(i.e. settime.actime = settime.modtime = (int)ftime; ) vs provide a
parameter for each.
Might it
On 30/09/2016 10:45 AM, Bob Rudis wrote:
Since there has been a recent tweak to the functionality of
Sys.setFileTime() I thought it might be an opportune time to ask a question
regarding the decision to set both access and modification times
(i.e. settime.actime = settime.modtime = (int)ftime; )
On 29.09.2016 22:57, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Dear all,
winbuilder is down.
Given current inspection results and circumstances, I expect a downtime
of *at least* 24 hours.
This applies to on-demand check services, CRAN check service results and
CRAN binary builds for Windows.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
W
On 30 September 2016 at 20:15, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| On 29.09.2016 22:57, Uwe Ligges wrote:
| > Dear all,
| >
| > winbuilder is down.
| >
| > Given current inspection results and circumstances, I expect a downtime
| > of *at least* 24 hours.
| >
| > This applies to on-demand check services, CRAN che
