> Radford Neal
> on Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:29:14 -0400 writes:
>> Radford Nea:
>> > So it may make more sense to move towards consistency in the
>> > permissive direction, rather than the restrictive direction.
>>
>> > That would mean allowing matrix(1,1,1) < (1:2), a
> > But isn't the intent to make it an error later? So I assume we're
> > debating making it an error, not just a warning.
>
> Yes, that's correct.
> But if we have a longish deprecation period (i.e. where there's
> only a warning) all important code should have been adapted
> before it
To clarify, the developers, Duncan Murdoch, Michael Lawrence, and Martin
Maechler, who are R Core Developers are participating in the project, but
this should not be construed to be an endorsement from the R Core
Developers as a whole, and the work of the R Documentation Task Force is
not guarantee
On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Radford Neal
wrote:
> > > But isn't the intent to make it an error later? So I assume we're
> > > debating making it an error, not just a warning.
> >
> > Yes, that's correct.
> > But if we have a longish deprecation period (i.e. where there's
> > only a
Hi,
On 09/12/2016 08:21 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Radford Neal
on Fri, 9 Sep 2016 10:29:14 -0400 writes:
>> Radford Nea:
>> > So it may make more sense to move towards consistency in the
>> > permissive direction, rather than the restrictive direction.
>>
>> > That wo
