Re: [Rd] paths for install and libraries?

2016-04-29 Thread Martin Maechler
> Dalthorp, Daniel > on Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:41:28 -0700 writes: > I've written a fairly elaborate package (called "eoa") > that relies on functions from several other packages. I've > built the package into a zip file on Windows using > Hadley's devtools::build(binary

[Rd] boxplot with formula involving two-factor levels

2016-04-29 Thread diy
Hi, I noticed two seemingly equivalent call to boxplot will give different plots (in the way how the combined factor levels are arranged on the x-axis): x = factor(rep(c("a", "b", "c"), each=2)); y = rep(factor(c("one", "two")), each=3); r = 3; n = r * 6; x = rep(x, 3); y = rep(y, 3); z = rnorm

Re: [Rd] paths for install and libraries?

2016-04-29 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 April 2016 at 16:41, Dalthorp, Daniel wrote: | I've written a fairly elaborate package (called "eoa") that relies on | functions from several other packages. I've built the package into a zip | file on Windows using Hadley's devtools::build(binary = T) and have sent | the zip to a couple doz

Re: [Rd] boxplot with formula involving two-factor levels

2016-04-29 Thread peter dalgaard
> On 29 Apr 2016, at 23:54 , d...@stat.oregonstate.edu wrote: > > Hi, > > I noticed two seemingly equivalent call to boxplot will give different plots > (in the way how the combined factor levels are arranged on the x-axis): > > x = factor(rep(c("a", "b", "c"), each=2)); > y = rep(factor(c("o