Thank you very much, Henrik, for maintaining this list -- it's always
a pleasure to see the ever growing number of useful R packages!
I decided a few times in the past to extend your research with the
list of archived packages, but did not actually start coding -- until
tonight: https://gist.githu
This is admittedly minor, and you shouldn't have repeated names in a
data frame anyway, but:
df <- data.frame(1:3, 1:3, 1:3)
# Ok
setNames(df, c("x", "y", ""))
# Not ok
setNames(df, c("x", "", ""))
Hadley
--
http://hadley.nz
__
R-devel@r-project.or
Thank you Gergely - great work.
So on planet CRAN with have a large living population of packages and
some deceased packages of the past ... and then there are packages
that reincarnate one or more times.
I wonder how long it will be before someone makes this into an R data
package? ;)
Cheers,
> Hadley Wickham
> on Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:12:00 -0600 writes:
> This is admittedly minor, and you shouldn't have repeated names in a
> data frame anyway, but:
> df <- data.frame(1:3, 1:3, 1:3)
> # Ok
> setNames(df, c("x", "y", ""))
> # Not ok
> setNames(d
> On 29 Feb 2016, at 19:54 , Barry Rowlingson
> wrote:
>
>> PS: somehow "historical" would be less unnerving than "archeological"
>
> At least I didn't say palaeontological.
So John should feel more like stone age than dinosaur?
(Some portion of this must be a fortune candidate!)
--
Peter
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 29 Feb 2016, at 19:54 , Barry Rowlingson
wrote:
PS: somehow "historical" would be less unnerving than "archeological"
At least I didn't say palaeontological.
So John should feel more like stone age than dinosaur?
(Some portion of this must
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Martin Maechler
wrote:
>> Hadley Wickham
>> on Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:12:00 -0600 writes:
>
> > This is admittedly minor, and you shouldn't have repeated names in a
> > data frame anyway, but:
>
> > df <- data.frame(1:3, 1:3, 1:3)
>
> > # O
