Hendrik pointed out it was the parentheses that gave the complaint.
Single quotes and no parentheses seem to satisfy R CMD check. Perhaps
that needs to be in the WRE.
However, I have for some time used the parentheses to distinguish
functions from packages. optim() is a function, optimx a package.
> On 25 Apr 2015, at 13:11 , Prof J C Nash (U30A) wrote:
>
> Hendrik pointed out it was the parentheses that gave the complaint.
> Single quotes and no parentheses seem to satisfy R CMD check. Perhaps
> that needs to be in the WRE.
Well, it is in ?toTitleCase:
...However, unknown
tec
How about allowing underscore? (I believe WRE is silent on this, and I
have not tried submitting a package with underscore in the title.) As I
pointed out in my OP, _optim()_ works. And we have the advantage that we
can distinguish package from function.
The purpose of consistent editing is surely
On Apr 25, 2015 05:07, "Prof J C Nash (U30A)" wrote:
>
> How about allowing underscore? (I believe WRE is silent on this, and I
> have not tried submitting a package with underscore in the title.) As I
> pointed out in my OP, _optim()_ works. And we have the advantage that we
> can distinguish pac
> "GC" == Gábor Csárdi writes:
GC> You can get an RSS/Atom feed, however, if that's good:
GC> https://github.com/wch/r-source/commits/master.atom
That is available in gwene/gmane as:
gwene.com.github.wch.r-source.commits.trunk
-JimC
--
James Cloos OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
