Re: [Rd] Proper way to define cbind, rbind for s4 classes in package

2015-02-20 Thread Martin Maechler
> Mario Annau > on Wed, 11 Feb 2015 20:18:53 +0100 writes: > sorry - I just got irritated by my different R-versions. > The behaviour I described in the previous mail was discovered using R > 3.1.2 without bind_activation(TRUE). In r67773 all calls are delegated > to r

[Rd] Can R for Windows be built outside of the top-level source directory?

2015-02-20 Thread Josh O'Brien
The "R-admin" manual describes how to build R from outside of the top-level source directory on a *NIX machine (http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#Simple-compilation), but it makes no analagous mention of a way to do so under Windows. Since the build process in Windows is

Re: [Rd] Can R for Windows be built outside of the top-level source directory?

2015-02-20 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 20/02/2015 12:30 PM, Josh O'Brien wrote: The "R-admin" manual describes how to build R from outside of the top-level source directory on a *NIX machine (http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-admin.html#Simple-compilation), but it makes no analagous mention of a way to do so under W

[Rd] requireNamespace etiquette

2015-02-20 Thread RKoenker
I'm trying to resolve a problem of Namespaces and probably have misunderstood something basic. In my quantreg package the function crq() has as its first argument a formula that typically contains something like this: Surv(y, ...) ~ foo, where Surv is a function from the survival package which qua

Re: [Rd] requireNamespace etiquette

2015-02-20 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 20/02/2015 21:15, RKoenker wrote: I'm trying to resolve a problem of Namespaces and probably have misunderstood something basic. In my quantreg package the function crq() has as its first argument a formula that typically contains something like this: Surv(y, ...) ~ foo, where Surv is a funct