[Rd] possible Sweave problem in rdevel build on Debian 6.0.8?

2013-10-23 Thread Skye Bender-deMoll
Dear R-Devel, Note: I posted a similar message to R-sig-debian yesterday because I assumed it was a Debian issue, received response that it it may be more appropriate for r-devel since it involves building from the svn version. As of Oct 21, we are running into a build failure when trying to

Re: [Rd] possible Sweave problem in rdevel build on Debian 6.0.8?

2013-10-23 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
Please try again: I could reproduce this on one system prior to r64100. On 22/10/2013 20:12, Skye Bender-deMoll wrote: Dear R-Devel, Note: I posted a similar message to R-sig-debian yesterday because I assumed it was a Debian issue, received response that it it may be more appropriate for r-de

Re: [Rd] possible Sweave problem in rdevel build on Debian 6.0.8?

2013-10-23 Thread peter dalgaard
Affirmative. I was seeing this in 64099, but it disappeared with 64101. (OSX Lion if it matters to anyone) -pd On Oct 23, 2013, at 10:30 , Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > Please try again: I could reproduce this on one system prior to r64100. > > On 22/10/2013 20:12, Skye Bender-deMoll wrote: >> De

Re: [Rd] possible Sweave problem in rdevel build on Debian 6.0.8?

2013-10-23 Thread Skye Bender-deMoll
That fixed it for me, r64100 is building cleanly again. thanks! -skye On 10/23/2013 01:37 AM, peter dalgaard wrote: Affirmative. I was seeing this in 64099, but it disappeared with 64101. (OSX Lion if it matters to anyone) -pd On Oct 23, 2013, at 10:30 , Prof Brian Ripley wrote: Please t

Re: [Rd] interrupting Sweave leaves open sink connection

2013-10-23 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 13-10-22 10:45 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 13-10-22 9:45 PM, Michael Sumner wrote: Hello, if I interrupt Sweave while it's processing a file it seemingly leaves an open sink connection that hides printed output. Can this be changed to reset the sink on exit? I've been baffled by this for y

[Rd] advise on Depends

2013-10-23 Thread Kasper Daniel Hansen
This is about the new note Depends: includes the non-default packages: ‘BiocGenerics’ ‘Biobase’ ‘lattice’ ‘reshape’ ‘GenomicRanges’ ‘Biostrings’ ‘bumphunter’ Adding so many packages to the search path is excessive and importing selectively is preferable. Let us say my package A either uses a