Re: [Rd] missing documentation entries ... WARNING

2013-10-15 Thread Luis Rodríguez
Thanks Duncan (and othersin R-devel). I clearly got away from this project, but I am still quite interested in resolving this issue and getting these codes into the CRAN. Some attempts to repair the documentation have occurred in the intervening time, so I am including slightly updated error me

[Rd] discrepancy between r cmd check --as-cran and messages at submission

2013-10-15 Thread corentin barbu
Dear r-devel list, I've observed at both of my submissions that issues arise at submission that were not pointed out by R cmd check --as-cran For example at my last submission: You have VignetteBuilder: knitr but there is nothing looking like a vignette in your source package We also see:

Re: [Rd] discrepancy between r cmd check --as-cran and messages at submission

2013-10-15 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 15/10/2013 01:04, corentin barbu wrote: Dear r-devel list, I've observed at both of my submissions that issues arise at submission that were not pointed out by R cmd check --as-cran For example at my last submission: You have VignetteBuilder: knitr but there is nothing looking like a vignet

Re: [Rd] Possible POSIXlt / wday glitch & bugs.r-project.org status

2013-10-15 Thread Joshua Ulrich
In an effort to redeem myself, I have found and submitted a patch for what seems to be causing this issue. Best, -- Joshua Ulrich | about.me/joshuaulrich FOSS Trading | www.fosstrading.com On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 1:18 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote: > On Oct 5, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Sean O'Riordain wr

[Rd] Two R editiosn in Unix cluster systems

2013-10-15 Thread Paul Johnson
Dear R Devel Some of our R users are still insisting we run R-2.15.3 because of difficulties with a package called OpenMX. It can't cooperate with new R, oh well. Other users need to run R-3.0.1. I'm looking for the most direct route to install both, and allow users to choose at runtime. In the

Re: [Rd] discrepancy between r cmd check --as-cran and messages at submission

2013-10-15 Thread corentin barbu
Thank you for your answer and sorry for skipping over this detail of checking with R-devel and not the current version of R. I wonder if checking with R-devel on this page is fine: http://win-builder.r-project.org/upload.aspx Thanks, Corentin On 15/10/2013 01:04, corentin barbu wrote: > Dear

Re: [Rd] Two R editiosn in Unix cluster systems

2013-10-15 Thread Peter Langfelder
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Paul Johnson wrote: > Dear R Devel > > Some of our R users are still insisting we run R-2.15.3 because of > difficulties with a package called OpenMX. It can't cooperate with new R, > oh well. > > Other users need to run R-3.0.1. I'm looking for the most direct ro

Re: [Rd] Two R editiosn in Unix cluster systems

2013-10-15 Thread Ista Zahn
OpenMx does install on R 3.01. I haven't tested extensively, but after installing with install.packages('OpenMx', dependencies = TRUE, repos = c(getOption("repos"), 'http://openmx.psyc.virginia.edu/sequential/')) the demos appear to run correctly. Best, Ista On

Re: [Rd] Two R editiosn in Unix cluster systems

2013-10-15 Thread Steven McKinney
> -Original Message- > From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] > On Behalf Of Paul Johnson > Sent: October-15-13 1:15 PM > To: R Devel List > Cc: Discussion of Rocks Clusters > Subject: [Rd] Two R editiosn in Unix cluster systems > > Dear R Devel > > So

[Rd] FW: Replacing the Random Number Generator in Stand Alone Library

2013-10-15 Thread Nigel Delaney
Okay, so I am guessing everyone had the same response I initially did when hearing that this RNG might not be so hot*... as an alternate question, if I submitted a patch to replace the current RNG with the twister, would it be accepted? -N -Original Message- From: Nigel Delaney [mailto:n