Re: [Rd] Possible POSIXlt / wday glitch & bugs.r-project.org status

2013-10-05 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Oct 4, 2013, at 4:59 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:11 AM, Imanuel Costigan wrote: >> Wanted to raise two questions: >> >> 1. Is bugs.r-project.org down? I haven't been able to reach it for two or >> three days: > > Yes. Quote from Duncan: > >... the server is

Re: [Rd] Allow semantic versioning for packages

2013-10-05 Thread Simon Urbanek
Gabor, what you propose is not really feasible, because R relies on the fact that it can meaningfully order the the versions as to determine the update order. If you use arbitrary strings then ordering becomes random - that's why git commit hashes are so useless for this purpose. The fact that

Re: [Rd] Possible POSIXlt / wday glitch & bugs.r-project.org status

2013-10-05 Thread Sean O'Riordain
Some people (luckily not me anymore!) working with mortgages and pensions need to calculate up to 40 years into the future for the payment schedule. On 5 October 2013 02:37, Joshua Ulrich wrote: > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 8:02 PM, Imanuel Costigan wrote: >> Thanks for the responses and quoting the

Re: [Rd] Allow semantic versioning for packages

2013-10-05 Thread Gábor Csárdi
Simon, I think there is a misunderstanding here. I am not suggesting anarchy, completely the opposite. Semantic versioning as defined on http://semver.org was designed exactly for being able to order the versions, and being able to express release candidates, alpha and beta builds, etc. An exampl

Re: [Rd] Possible POSIXlt / wday glitch & bugs.r-project.org status

2013-10-05 Thread Simon Urbanek
On Oct 5, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Sean O'Riordain wrote: > Some people (luckily not me anymore!) working with mortgages and > pensions need to calculate up to 40 years into the future for the > payment schedule. > Just to clarify since the Joshua's comment was ambiguous (and in part plain wrong) - R

Re: [Rd] Allow semantic versioning for packages

2013-10-05 Thread Simon Urbanek
Gabor, On Oct 5, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > Simon, > > I think there is a misunderstanding here. I am not suggesting anarchy, > completely the opposite. > > Semantic versioning as defined on http://semver.org was designed exactly for > being able to order the versions, and being

Re: [Rd] Allow semantic versioning for packages

2013-10-05 Thread Gábor Csárdi
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Simon Urbanek wrote: > Gabor, > > On Oct 5, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > > > Simon, > > > > I think there is a misunderstanding here. I am not suggesting anarchy, > completely the opposite. > > > > Semantic versioning as defined on http://semver.org was

Re: [Rd] Possible POSIXlt / wday glitch & bugs.r-project.org status

2013-10-05 Thread Imanuel Costigan
Thanks for the clarification Simon. Having a look at the code in datetime.c, I can't say that I envy its maintainer. Looks like there are a lot of "hacks" to get things working. For the time being, I am going to override the TZ environment variable to be UTC as at this time I don't need to wor