On 17/04/2013 21:25, Michael Lawrence wrote:
It's tough to reliably reproduce, but I often get stack imbalance warnings
when calling max.col() on non-real/double matrix. The code is conditionally
PROTECTing but not incrementing its nprot counter for the eventual
UNPROTECT. Pretty sure this would
Hi,
I have a simple package with two functions. It essentially implements
estimators and data simulation for a paper I am writing for immunology (and
in some sense, ecology). How long is the typical CRAN review process -- and
how long will it take to get through the process? How selective is it
I went through the same problem and discovery process 2 years ago with the
survival package. With pspline() terms the return object from coxph includes
a simple 6 line function for enhanced printout, which by default carried along
another 30 irrelevant things some of which were huge.
I person
On 04/19/2013 01:16 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 17/04/2013 21:25, Michael Lawrence wrote:
It's tough to reliably reproduce, but I often get stack imbalance warnings
when calling max.col() on non-real/double matrix. The code is conditionally
PROTECTing but not incrementing its nprot counter f
On 13-04-18 11:39 AM, Thomas Alexander Gerds wrote:
Dear Duncan
thank you for taking the time to answer my questions! It will be quite
some work to delete all the objects generated inside the function
... but if there is no other way to avoid a large environment then this
is what I will do.
It
On 13-04-19 8:41 AM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. wrote:
I went through the same problem and discovery process 2 years ago with the
survival package. With pspline() terms the return object from coxph includes
a simple 6 line function for enhanced printout, which by default carried along
anoth
On 18.04.2013 18:05, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 18 April 2013 17:38:06 Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
I've got an information from Prof. Ripley regarding a bug found
with AdressSanitizer in one of our packages. It is now fixed, thank
you for this information.
Now, I would like to
Duncan,
I stand by all my comments. Well behaved function -- those that look
only at their input arguments -- do just fine with a simple env.
Now as to formulas --- the part of R that has most aggressively messed
with normal evaluation rules. It is quite possible that there is/was no
other way
On 19/04/2013 18:22, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
On 18.04.2013 18:05, José Matos wrote:
On Thursday 18 April 2013 17:38:06 Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
I've got an information from Prof. Ripley regarding a bug found
with AdressSanitizer in one of our packages. It is now fixed, thank
yo
hmm. I have tested a bit more, and found this perhaps more difficult
solve situation. even though I delete x, since x is part of the output
of the formula, the size of the object is twice as much as it should be:
test <- function(x){
x <- rnorm(100)
out <- list(x=x)
rm(x)
out$f <- as.
On Apr 19, 2013, at 2:19 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On 19/04/2013 18:22, Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
>> On 18.04.2013 18:05, José Matos wrote:
>>> On Thursday 18 April 2013 17:38:06 Thomas Petzoldt wrote:
Dear R developers,
I've got an information from Prof. Ripley regarding a bug
Having finally found some free time, I was going to use it to update a
bunch of R packages from 2.15 to 3.0.
I am running Windows 7, 64-bit professional. This is on a brand-new
laptop using vanilla settings when installing the operating system.
Problem 1: I installed R3.0 to the default loca
On 13-04-19 5:37 PM, Kevin Coombes wrote:
Having finally found some free time, I was going to use it to update a
bunch of R packages from 2.15 to 3.0.
I am running Windows 7, 64-bit professional. This is on a brand-new
laptop using vanilla settings when installing the operating system.
Problem
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 13-04-19 5:37 PM, Kevin Coombes wrote:
>>
>> Having finally found some free time, I was going to use it to update a
>> bunch of R packages from 2.15 to 3.0.
>>
>> I am running Windows 7, 64-bit professional. This is on a brand-new
>> lap
14 matches
Mail list logo
