Hi,
I know this has been reported/asked before (
http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e15/devel/11/10/0831.html) but it would
still be just nice to have a fix for the not user-friendly fact that one
cannot create a completely empty package skeleton (see previous post for a
suggested patch).
In the s
On 13-04-13 10:03 PM, Andre Mikulec wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
Thu Apr 11 13:32:02 CEST 2013
Previous message: [Rd] windows compile R from source, where do I put the Tcl
directory?
Next message: [Rd] Trying to make DEBUG=T a debug version of R
Messages sorted by: [ date ]
On 14 April 2013 at 14:10, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
| Hi,
|
| I know this has been reported/asked before (
| http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e15/devel/11/10/0831.html) but it would
| still be just nice to have a fix for the not user-friendly fact that one
| cannot create a completely empty package
... and my suggestion for an easy way to skip defined variables comes from
the case of fresh non-vanilla sessions that willingly inherit user-defined
variables from .Rprofile.
2013/4/14 Dirk Eddelbuettel
>
> On 14 April 2013 at 14:10, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | I know this has been r
> Dirk Eddelbuettel
> on Sun, 14 Apr 2013 06:51:38 -0500 writes:
> On 14 April 2013 at 14:10, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
> | Hi,
> |
> | I know this has been reported/asked before (
> | http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e15/devel/11/10/0831.html) but it
would
> |
I did some benchmarking of data frame code, and
it appears that R 3.0.0 is far worse than earlier versions of R
in terms of how many large objects it allocates space for,
for data frame operations - creation, subscripting, subscript replacement.
For a data frame with n rows, it makes either 2 or 4
There were a couple of bug fixes to somewhat obscure compound
assignment related bugs that required bumping up internal reference
counts. It's possible that one or more of these are responsible. If so
it is unavoidable for now, but it's worth finding out for sure. With
some stripped down test exam
On 04/14/2013 07:11 PM, luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote:
There were a couple of bug fixes to somewhat obscure compound
assignment related bugs that required bumping up internal reference
counts. It's possible that one or more of these are responsible. If so
it is unavoidable for now, but it's worth
When I change the data set size, the "extra allocations" do
not change in size. This supports Luke and Martin's diagnosis.
The extra allocations are either 2 or 4 allocations each of size
80040
240048
320040
Details (you may skip):
(Fresh session of R 3.0.0)
> y <- 1:10^4 + 0.0
> Rprofmem("temp
POSIX-style execute permission isn't a Windows concept, so it was
fortuitous this ever worked. One possibility is that Cygwin was
involved, and a Cygwin emulation got set when tar unpacked the file and
converted back to the tar representation when Cygwin tar produced the
tarball. (The tar in R
10 matches
Mail list logo
