Hi the list
In the DESCRIPTION file of my package foo0, I have:
Depends: foo1
Imports: foo2
Suggest: foo3
Enhence: foo4
If I understand correctly, to install foo0 on my computer, I need to already
have foo1, foo2, foo3.
foo4 is not necessary.
I my R sesssion, when I will write: library(foo0),
On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
> Hi the list
>
> In the DESCRIPTION file of my package foo0, I have:
>
> Depends: foo1
> Imports: foo2
> Suggest: foo3
> Enhence: foo4
>
(it is really "Suggests" and "Enhances" - the above are typos I presume and
thus won't be recogniz
Thanks a lot for your answer.
(it is really "Suggests" and "Enhances" - the above are typos I presume and
thus won't be recognized)
Yes, it was typo. Sorry
No, you only need foo1 and foo2. The other two are optional.
I get:
* checking package dependencies ... ERROR
Package suggested but no
On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
>
>> Hi the list
>>
>> In the DESCRIPTION file of my package foo0, I have:
>>
>> Depends: foo1
>> Imports: foo2
>> Suggest: foo3
>> Enhence: foo4
>>
>
> (it is really "Suggests" an
On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Simon Urbanek
> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
>>
>>> Hi the list
>>>
>>> In the DESCRIPTION file of my package foo0, I have:
>>>
>>> Depends: foo1
>>> Imports: foo2
On Nov 6, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
> Thanks a lot for your answer.
>
>> (it is really "Suggests" and "Enhances" - the above are typos I presume and
>> thus won't be recognized)
> Yes, it was typo. Sorry
>> No, you only need foo1 and foo2. The other two are optional.
> I ge
On 06.11.2012 17:55, Christophe Genolini wrote:
Thanks a lot for your answer.
(it is really "Suggests" and "Enhances" - the above are typos I
presume and thus won't be recognized)
Yes, it was typo. Sorry
No, you only need foo1 and foo2. The other two are optional.
I get:
* checking pack
Hi the list
I have package foo0 with a big dataset 'myData'.
In DESCRIPTION, if I use 'LazyData: no', then I get:
- when I open a R session : memory used=20 908
- when I attach 'library(foo0)' : memory used=24364
- then I load the set 'data(myData)' : memory used=39 668
If I use LazyData: ye
On 11/06/2012 11:36 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Nov 6, 2012, at 11:19 AM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
>
>> Hi the list
>>
>> In the DESCRIPTION file of my package foo0, I have:
>>
>> Depends: foo1
>> Imports: foo2
>> Suggest: foo3
>> Enhence: foo4
>
> No, you only need foo1 and foo2. The oth
On 11/06/2012 12:49 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> - 'Depends:foo1' if there is a function in foo1 that my package use often
>
> No, better make use of Namespace imports all the time and only use
> "Depends" if you really need the other package to be installed. This is
> rarely needed.
>
On Nov 6, 2012, at 1:03 PM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
> Hi the list
>
> I have package foo0 with a big dataset 'myData'.
> In DESCRIPTION, if I use 'LazyData: no', then I get:
>
> - when I open a R session : memory used=20 908
> - when I attach 'library(foo0)' : memory used=24364
> - then I lo
On 2012-11-06, at 9:49 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> On 06.11.2012 17:55, Christophe Genolini wrote:
>>
>>> "Imports" means that symbols are imported form the namespace, so they
>>> are mandatory for the package to operate. "Suggests" means that
>>> symbols from the package are not required, but they a
Hi,
Looks like this was addressed in revision 61083, thanks!
Note that the example provided for update.packages is still the
same i.e. it shows how to use install.packages instead of
update.packages.
Cheers,
H.
On 11/01/2012 05:13 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi,
Found in the man page for update.pa
On Nov 6, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:
> On 2012-11-06, at 9:49 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>> On 06.11.2012 17:55, Christophe Genolini wrote:
>>>
"Imports" means that symbols are imported form the namespace, so they
are mandatory for the package to operate. "Suggests" means th
Hi,
\description paragraph in man page for download.packages doesn't
seem to have anything to do with download.packages:
These functions can be used to automatically compare the version
numbers of installed packages with the newest available version on
the repositories and update outdated
On 06.11.2012 21:17, Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Nov 6, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:
On 2012-11-06, at 9:49 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 06.11.2012 17:55, Christophe Genolini wrote:
"Imports" means that symbols are imported form the namespace, so they
are mandatory for the package to
Hi,
Found in \value section of man page for tools::write_PACKAGES:
Invisibly returns the number of packages described in the resulting
\file{PACKAGES} and \file{PACKAGES.gz} files. If \code{0}, no
packages were found and no files were written.
Those days (don't know when this has changed
On Nov 6, 2012, at 3:43 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>
>
> On 06.11.2012 21:17, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 6, 2012, at 2:44 PM, Davor Cubranic wrote:
>>
>>> On 2012-11-06, at 9:49 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>>>
On 06.11.2012 17:55, Christophe Genolini wrote:
>
>> "Imports" means tha
I get it from windows tack manager (under Window 7). I guess it is in K
something.
My point was not about "how big is my dataset" (anyway, it is a fake dataset, so it can be as big as
I want) but more about "where on hell are lost the 52 760 - 39 668 K ?"
:-)
Christophe
On Nov 6, 2012, at 1
On Nov 6, 2012, at 5:13 PM, Christophe Genolini wrote:
> I get it from windows tack manager (under Window 7). I guess it is in K
> something.
> My point was not about "how big is my dataset" (anyway, it is a fake dataset,
> so it can be as big as I want) but more about "where on hell are lost t
My real point was to explore the LazyData mechanism. So I try with LazyData: no and with LazyData:
yes to see the difference, to see if I understand correctly the "WRE". The difference of the memory
allocation pointed by the task manager alarm me, but you are right (I read the FAQ 7.42): my
ques
I have been having trouble passing a default argument to
base::as.Date.character and think it is due to some funkiness in the
function definition.
base::as.Date.character is defined as
function (x, format = "", ...) {
# stuff deleted
res <- if (missing(format))
charToDate(x)
22 matches
Mail list logo
