Re: [Rd] CRAN check error with no example?

On Aug 25, 2012, at 03:57 , Spencer Graves wrote: > Hi, Henrik: > > > Thanks. That suggests I should ignore this error message. That was my > tentative plan, but I felt a need to mention it to this group before I did. Hum, it might not be your problem, but that error message is potentia

[Rd] cyclic namespace dependency detected

I'm having trouble installing my quantreg package on R version 2.15.1 (2012-06-22) -- "Roasted Marshmallows" Copyright (C) 2012 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing ISBN 3-900051-07-0 Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit) Seems odd since the CRAN version seems to be fine, but

[Rd] how to keep the documents of private functions private

First time posting on this forum. The short version of the question is how to keep the documents of private (unexported) functions private. It seems that the documents of the private functions will be compiled into the user manual even if the corresponding functions are not exported. Is there a

Re: [Rd] include dll in R-package

Thanks for the clarification. Just wonder if I don't host the package on CRAN, am I able to build a package without source codes to distribute it from my institutions homepage? Seems not for the newer version? Thanks! Liying - Original Message - From: "Kasper Daniel Hansen" To: "Dirk

Re: [Rd] how to keep the documents of private functions private

On 12-08-24 11:56 AM, Yanming Di wrote: First time posting on this forum. The short version of the question is how to keep the documents of private (unexported) functions private. It seems that the documents of the private functions will be compiled into the user manual even if the correspondi

Re: [Rd] how to keep the documents of private functions private

> To provide some background, a more general question is how to manage > unexported (private) functions in an R package. I need to call them during > the developing phase or even after the package is released (e.g., for > debugging purpose or they may be needed by new functions), but I don’t wan

Re: [Rd] include dll in R-package

On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:39 AM, LIYING HUANG wrote: > > Thanks for the clarification. Just wonder if I don't host the > package on CRAN, am I able to build a package without > source codes to distribute it from my institutions homepage? > Seems not for the newer version? I think that is a valid