On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:49:26AM -0400, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> I suspect that your runtime/libc is defining fgetc as a macro which breaks
> any code that uses it as an identifier. Ideally, your runtime should be fixed
> to use a proper function, but you could probably work around it with
> som
On Aug 13, 2012, at 20:22 , nobody wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:49:26AM -0400, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>> I suspect that your runtime/libc is defining fgetc as a macro which breaks
>> any code that uses it as an identifier. Ideally, your runtime should be
>> fixed to use a proper function,
Ouch - typo, misread ...
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 14, 2012, at 7:48 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 2012, at 20:22 , nobody wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 10:49:26AM -0400, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>> I suspect that your runtime/libc is defining fgetc as a macro which breaks
>>>
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:48:44PM +0200, peter dalgaard wrote:
>
> Perhaps I'm confused, but how did either of you expect to fix a problem with
> fgetc by modifying fgets???
>
> --
> Peter Dalgaard, Professor
> Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School
> Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederik
On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:19 AM, nobody wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:48:44PM +0200, peter dalgaard wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps I'm confused, but how did either of you expect to fix a problem with
>> fgetc by modifying fgets???
>>
>> --
>> Peter Dalgaard, Professor
>> Center for Statistics, Copen
Dear all,
summary:
My LC_NUMERIC is changed from C to de_DE by library (qtbase).
[which shouldn't happen according to the warning when setting it back
manually].
I posted an issue at their github repository, but maybe the behaviour is
a bit more of general interest.
However, if LC_NUMERIC is cha
Hi all,
Is there an R wrapper for chown/chgrp (a la Sys.chmod)? I couldn't
find one with a few minutes of searching, but it seems like a curious
omission.
Thanks,
Hadley
--
Assistant Professor
Department of Statistics / Rice University
http://had.co.nz/
__
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:32:22AM -0400, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 2012, at 10:19 AM, nobody wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 01:48:44PM +0200, peter dalgaard wrote:
> >>
> >> Perhaps I'm confused, but how did either of you expect to fix a problem
> >> with fgetc by modifying fge
