Re: [Rd] Cannot Install Custom Package On Windows7 64-bit

2012-05-18 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 18.05.2012 08:55, Steve Pederson wrote: Hi, After uninstalling Rtools 2.14.0, I have installed the latest version of Rtools 2.15.0 which gives the two folders C:\Rtools\bin C:\Rtools\gcc-4.6.3 R is installed in the directory C:\R\R-2.15.0 I have set the Environment Variable PATH

Re: [Rd] Cannot Install Custom Package On Windows7 64-bit

2012-05-18 Thread Steve Pederson
Thank you for the look with fresh eyes Uwe. It was just the simple solution of opening a new command shell window. I thought I'd tried that along with the multiple reboots, but it must have been before I figured out the correct PATH settings. And thanks for the CYGWIN reminder too. :) All the be

Re: [Rd] R-devel on FreeBSD: new C99 functions don't build

2012-05-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 15/05/2012 20:45, Rainer Hurling wrote: On 15.05.2012 20:49 (UTC+1), Murray Stokely wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote: About April 25th, there had been some changes within R-devel's src/nmath/pnbeta.c (and probably some other relevant places) and now building R-de

[Rd] Distributing Executables.

2012-05-18 Thread Daniel Fuka
Sorry for this intrusion, but I am confused by two statements that appear to conflict at some level in Writing R Extensions, and wanted to make sure I understand the answer to: Can we distribute a portable executable compiled from source by CRAN in CRAN? The following section of Writing R Extensio

Re: [Rd] Distributing Executables.

2012-05-18 Thread Simon Urbanek
On May 18, 2012, at 11:11 AM, Daniel Fuka wrote: > Sorry for this intrusion, but I am confused by two statements that > appear to conflict at some level in Writing R Extensions, and wanted > to make sure I understand the answer to: > Can we distribute a portable executable compiled from source by

Re: [Rd] Distributing Executables.

2012-05-18 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On 18/05/2012 16:11, Daniel Fuka wrote: Sorry for this intrusion, but I am confused by two statements that appear to conflict at some level in Writing R Extensions, You may be confused, but the documentation does not conflict. > and wanted to make sure I understand the answer to: Can we distr

Re: [Rd] test suites for packages

2012-05-18 Thread Cook, Malcolm
svUnit - is Runit compatible and provides some IDE integration and report generation and easy syntax for defining tests. I find it works a treat, and fits very nicely with my R coding/packaging style (which also uses inlinedocs for easy package creation). --Malcolm Cook On 5/17/12 9:10 AM, "Wh

Re: [Rd] Distributing Executables.

2012-05-18 Thread Daniel Fuka
Thanks Simon, In this case, I am talking specifically about allowing CRAN to compile source into an executable to be distributed, as discussed in the second paragraphs "very special cases .. for example executable programs". So, when someone runs install.packages("mypackage"), they get a package t

Re: [Rd] Distributing Executables.

2012-05-18 Thread Simon Urbanek
On May 18, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Daniel Fuka wrote: > Thanks Simon, > > In this case, I am talking specifically about allowing CRAN to compile > source into an executable to be distributed, as discussed in the > second paragraphs "very special cases .. for example executable > programs". So, when so

[Rd] bug in R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30)?

2012-05-18 Thread Wincent
The returned text by license() says, This can be displayed by RShowDoc("COPYING.LIB"), or obtained at the URI given. However, > RShowDoc("COPYING.LIB") Error in RShowDoc("COPYING.LIB") : document not found Also, is URI a typo of URL? -- Wincent Ronggui HUANG Sociology Department of Fudan Unive