Dear all,
Now that R has OpenMP facilities, I'm trying to use it for my own package but
I'm still wondering if it is safe to use random number generation within a
OpenMP block. I looked at the R writing extension document both on the OpenMP
and Random number generation but didn't find any info
On 22/02/2012 08:23, Mathieu Ribatet wrote:
Dear all,
Now that R has OpenMP facilities,
Hmm, not exactly new.
I'm trying to use it for my own package but I'm still wondering if it
is safe to use random number generation within a OpenMP block. I looked
at the R writing extension document bo
Hello,
For your information, I plan to release "soon" a package with a fast and
multithreaded aware RNG for C++ code in R packages.
It is currently part of one of my (not yet accepted) packages and I want to
extract it into its own package.
I plan to do some quick benchmarks too.
Of course I can
Regardless of the page's other merits (looks nice to me), I did enjoy
seeing my favorite teacher's (Dev Basu's) elephant in the Bayesian box.
Thanks for that.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Hi.
> Now that R has OpenMP facilities, I'm trying to use it for my own package but
> I'm still wondering if it is safe to use random number generation within a
> OpenMP block. I looked at the R writing extension document both on the
> OpenMP and Random number generation but didn't find any in
Hi,
In a way, a simple text based system is clean and is consistent with
the plain text requirements of the listservs, and interacting with R
through code/text. However, for people with different backgrounds, it
can seem unappealing. I definitely believe your page is more
inviting.
I work at a
Greetings. Answers below.
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Petr Savicky wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> In the description of your project in the file
>
> http://winstat.quant.ku.edu/svn/hpcexample/trunk/Ex66-ParallelSeedPrototype/README
>
> you argue as follows
>
> Question: Why is this better than the si
(Can we please follow the terminology in the ?ReferenceClasses
documentation. Creativity is fine but here we need communication)
This has come up (once) before off-list. It could be made part of
reference classes via a general rewriting that would improve efficiency
as well. Not imminent, b
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:17:25PM -0600, Paul Johnson wrote:
[...]
> In order for this to be easy for users, I need to put the init streams
> and set current stream functions into a package, and then streamline
> the process of creating the seed array. My opinion is that CRAN is
> now overflowed
Dirk - I'm having the same issue. Could you provide the details of your
solution?
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 28 January 2012 at 16:52, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> |
> |
> | On 27.01.2012 15:57, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | >
> | > On 12 January 2012 at 12:12, Herv
10 matches
Mail list logo