On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> It's not the cool kids who are doing this, it's the lazy kids ;)
laziness being one of the three virtues of a programmer. The other
two being hubris and something else I don't have time to look up at
the moment.
library(fortunes) fodder:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being
maintained? The last update to the CRAN was about 2 years ago. Earlier in
the year I found I wanted to use the short caption option of LaTeX tables to
display an abridged title in my table of contents. It was a relatively
s
On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being
maintained? The last update to the CRAN was about 2 years ago. Earlier in
the year I found I wanted to use the short caption option of LaTeX tables to
display an abridged title in my
On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being
maintained? The last update to the CRAN was about 2 years ago.
Earlier in
the year I found I wanted to use the short caption option of LaT
I would be leery of just taking over as maintainer if a package still
works and passes all checks on CRAN.
My personal take is that even commercial packages ignore feature
requests, and to expect such from an OSS one is expecting too much.
Of course patches are welcomed, but they can't honestly be
All I need now is a tool to go through the 4 packages I already
created without Roxygen and spit out source files with the Roxygen
comments in them...
really lazy.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>> | In other languages, I've seen to write the documentation inside the
>
This is mainly a reminder to others developing R packages to be careful not to
supply
control list items that are not used by the called package. Optimx is a wrapper
package
that aims to provide a common syntax to a number of existing optimization
packages.
Recently in extending optimx package I
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:23 AM, steven mosher wrote:
> All I need now is a tool to go through the 4 packages I already
> created without Roxygen and spit out source files with the Roxygen
> comments in them...
>
> really lazy.
>
>
That's what Rd2roxygen does...
Best,
--
Joshua Ulrich | FOSS
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:31 PM, John C Nash wrote:
> This is mainly a reminder to others developing R packages to be careful not
> to supply
> control list items that are not used by the called package. Optimx is a
> wrapper package
> that aims to provide a common syntax to a number of existin
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote:
>
>
> On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> >
> >
> >On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>
> >>I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being
> >>maintained? The last update to the CRAN was abo
On 9/10/2011 10:19 AM, oliver wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively being
maintained? The last update to the CRA
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:19 PM, oliver wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote:
>> >>Hi,
>> >>
>> >>I wonder if anyone knows if the xtable package is still actively
I think posting this to R-devel was a good idea. In any case, the new
maintainer should be aware about the many dependencies and that she or
he should be careful not to break code of others when updating.
Thank you for your contributions!!!
Best wishes,
Uwe Ligges
On 10.09.2011 19:14, Dav
Hello,
Regarding whether xtable is still maintained, yes, but at a minimal level.
I am committed to ensuring that it passes the tests on the latest version
of R, but I am having difficulty finding the time and interest in
incorporating new features. So, I'd be very glad if someone would like to
Exactly. Rd2roxygen is proud to be a member of the "Lazy Ally", and
tries to make diligent developers lazier... Although it does not
guarantee a perfect transition from Rd to roxygen (be sure to check
out the documentation), it should be able to save you a considerable
amount of time.
Regards,
Yih
Thanks, I was too lazy to even look for it.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 11:23 AM, steven mosher
> wrote:
>> All I need now is a tool to go through the 4 packages I already
>> created without Roxygen and spit out source files with the Roxyge
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 10:24:49AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote:
> On 9/10/2011 10:19 AM, oliver wrote:
> >On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 07:40:24AM -0700, Spencer Graves wrote:
> >>
> >>On 9/10/2011 6:06 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
> >>>
> >>>On 10.09.2011 13:26, Alastair wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wonder
Hello,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:14:07PM -0500, David B. Dahl wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Regarding whether xtable is still maintained, yes, but at a minimal level.
> I am committed to ensuring that it passes the tests on the latest version
> of R, but I am having difficulty finding the time and intere
I create & maintain all my packages using the 'mvbutils' package. Documentation
in plain-text format (not Rd) is stored along with each function definition---
so when you edit your function, its doco is right there too, and it looks like
proper documentation, not code-comments or quasi-Latex. Th
I needed to do a little cleanup on my packages ( before trying
Rd2Roxygen) and that involved
switching some packages from my Depends list to Imports.
Specifically, I had a dependency on "R.utils", but since I only used
one or two functions
(gunzip ) I thought it best to importFrom("R.utils",gunz
Disregard. I found the problem. A stray "require" statement I didnt
find on the first pass through the code.
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 6:03 PM, steven mosher wrote:
> I needed to do a little cleanup on my packages ( before trying
> Rd2Roxygen) and that involved
> switching some packages from my
21 matches
Mail list logo
