[Rd] data set mube S4 class to be submitted to Bioconductor

Dear R Developers, I am developing a package to submit to bioconductor. Right now, a gene-set sample data is saved as a data frame. Each row contains a probe set and its corresponding gene-set name ( mutiple probe -set may map to a gene-set name) . Is this type of data format OK to be submitted t

Re: [Rd] data set mube S4 class to be submitted to Bioconductor

On 10/12/2010 07:38 AM, lan gao wrote: > Dear R Developers, > > I am developing a package to submit to bioconductor. Right now, a gene-set > sample data is saved as a data frame. Each row contains a probe set and its > corresponding gene-set name ( mutiple probe -set may map to a gene-set name) >

[Rd] FW: [R] same random numbers in different sessions

From R-help ... >I notice that you have the IPSUR package loaded; you know, just a >shot in the dark here, but did you try not loading it? > >I ask because the vignette is built by making a special choice for >set.seed, and the workspace that ships with the package might be >interacting in an unex

Re: [Rd] FW: [R] same random numbers in different sessions

Dear Paul, On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote: > From R-help > ... >>I notice that you have the IPSUR package loaded;  you know, just a >>shot in the dark here, but did you try not loading it? >> >>I ask because the vignette is built by making a special choice for >>set.seed, and

Re: [Rd] 'R CMD build' not cleaning the src/ folder on Windows

This problems seems to be solved in current R 2.12 RC. Thanks! H. On 10/10/2010 10:47 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote: Hi, 'R CMD build' (with R 2.12.0 RC) fails to clean the src/ folder on Windows: D:\biocbld\bbs-2.7-bioc>ls meat/BUS/src BUS.cpp BUS.h D:\biocbld\bbs-2.7-bioc>R\bin\R CMD build meat\BU

[Rd] Wierd nlm behaviour in 2.10.1 and 2.12.0 [Sec=Unclassified]

Hi all, When upgrading to 2.11.1 recently I noticed different results being produced by my code. After much digging I have finally narrowed it to a call to nlm(). This can be replicated by: FixedRemovals<-1836180125888 AbStageInitial<-2223033830403 Rates<- 0.3102445 nlm(function(rootM,Abund,Lo

[Rd] Wierd nlm behaviour in 2.10.1 and 2.12.0 [Sec=Unclassified]

Hi all, When upgrading to 2.11.1 recently I noticed different results being produced by my code. After MUCH digging into my code I have finally narrowed it to a call to nlm(). The problem actually occurs in 2.10.1 and 2.12.0. This can be replicated by trying the code below in some different vers