Hello,
I'm trying to make .DollarNames generic and implement a method for it in
a package. .DollarNames is the function that is now called to get
completion possibilities.
My R code looks like this:
setGeneric( ".DollarNames" )
setClass("track",
representation(x="numeric", y="numer
This seems to do the trick, but it does not feel right:
.onLoad <- function( libname, pkgname ){
utils <- asNamespace( "utils" )
unlockBinding( ".DollarNames", utils )
assignInNamespace( ".DollarNames", .DollarNames, utils )
lockBinding( ".DollarNames", utils
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm trying to make .DollarNames generic and implement a method for it in a
> package. .DollarNames is the function that is now called to get completion
> possibilities.
>
> My R code looks like this:
>
> setGeneric( ".DollarNames
Le 29/05/10 20:23, Deepayan Sarkar a écrit :
On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 4:21 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to make .DollarNames generic and implement a method for it in a
package. .DollarNames is the function that is now called to get completion
possibilities.
My R code looks lik
The idea of modifying .DollarNames to recognize S4 methods is OK, but
the problem could arise again.
It would be better to have a general solution. The general problem as
it seems is that an S3 generic called from within its package's
namespace (or from some other 3rd package) will not detect
Thanks. I'll apply the nice workaround for now.
Romain
Le 29/05/10 23:15, John Chambers a écrit :
The idea of modifying .DollarNames to recognize S4 methods is OK, but
the problem could arise again.
It would be better to have a general solution. The general problem as
it seems is that an S3 g
