On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Simon Urbanek
> wrote:
> Copyright is the right that the author of an original work holds
> automatically (unless someone else can claim to own his work - e.g. his
> employer etc.) under the Berne Convent
Hi.
Here are some guidelines that I find useful:
- Avoid changing the arguments of generic functions provided by the
default R packages, especially the ones in base. Just, accept those
arguments. If there are extra arguments you don't like, you can
always add '...' to your method and they will
Simon Urbanek a écrit :
On Feb 12, 2010, at 7:14 PM, Dominick Samperi wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 11:54 AM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
Copyright is the right that the author of an original work holds automatically
(unless someone else can claim to own his work - e.g. his employer etc.) under
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> In practice this issue seldom arises as the whole idea of open source is
> collaborative development, i.e., it explicitly allows others to modify and
> redistribute the code. There is often at least a semi-centralized entity
> that represen
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:33 , blue sky wrote:
>
>> R-exts.pdf dosen't list many types that are supported in C++, for example,
>> long. Are there storage.mode corresponds to those extra types?
>>
>
> There are none - that's why they are not l
On Feb 13, 2010, at 5:04 PM, blue sky wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Simon Urbanek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 12, 2010, at 12:33 , blue sky wrote:
>>
>>> R-exts.pdf dosen't list many types that are supported in C++, for example,
>>> long. Are there storage.mode corresponds to those extr
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
> No, you give rights (to modify and redistribute) via the license to
> everybody, but not the copyright. As a copyright holder you can do anything
> with your original code (re-license it, use commercially etc.) but anyone
> else can only do
> a) restriction of representable integers. Today's platforms use 32-bit
> integers, but on 16-bit platforms is used to be 16-bit hence the "almost".
Just to make sure if I understand you correctly. So there are no
64-bit intergers on any platform?
__
