FYI,
no MacOS X binaries have been built for CRAN since 2010-01-07:
> url <- "http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/universal/contrib/r-release/";;
> x <- readLines(url);
pattern <- ".*([0-9]{2}-[A-Za-z]{3}-[0-9]{4}) ([0-9]{2}:[0-9]{2}).*";
y <- grep(pattern, x, value=TRUE);
y <- grep("PACKAGE", y
Not an issue for *this* list!
Please report to the maintainer and perhaps cc R-sig-mac. Note that
you are looking at the (old) Tiger binaries and not the more current
Leopard ones, which were last updated yesterday,
In any case, binary packages are a privilege and you can always
install fro
Hi All,
I want to build R-2.10.0 on HP-UX, but I got following error message:
ld: Unsatisfied symbol "zgemm" in file CHOLMOD.a[cholmod_l_super_numeric.o]
ld: Unsatisfied symbol "zgemv" in file CHOLMOD.a[cholmod_l_super_solve.o]
ld: Unsatisfied symbol "zherk" in file CHOLMOD.a[cholmod_l_super_n
Hello all,
I posted the following bug last week:
# These calls work correctly:
match(c("A", "B", "C"), c("A","C"), incomparables=NA) # okay
match(c("A", "B", "C"), "A") # okay
match("A", c("A", "B"), incomparables=NA) # okay
# This one causes R to hang:
match(c("A", "B", "C"), "A", incomparable
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
> Not an issue for *this* list!
I used this list to share this with package developers - not
particularly MacOS X users. As a package provider I'd like to know
when packages are not available on all platforms. It seems like a
errors, be
On Jan 18, 2010, at 7:53 , Henrik Bengtsson wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
Not an issue for *this* list!
I used this list to share this with package developers - not
particularly MacOS X users. As a package provider I'd like to know
when packages are not a
Prof. Ripley,
Thank you for the explanation. I appreciate both understanding what's
happening, and having several options for fixing my scripts.
-Don
At 7:17 AM + 1/16/10, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010, Don MacQueen wrote:
Here's an example (session info at the end).
Hello,
We'd like to use the flag -std=c++0x to take advantage of features of
the forthcoming C++0x standard that is already partly implemented by the
GCC >= 4.3
R CMD check warns about the flag because it is non portable. Is there a
way to turn the warning off, considering that we do test th
The model frame shows the response and predictors in a data frame with
nicely labelled columns:
fm <- lm(wt~qsec+log(hp)+sqrt(disp), data=mtcars)
model.frame(fm) # ok
When the left hand side consists of more than one response, those response
variables still look good, inside a matrix:
fm
My company recently started using a R library from RCRAN that is
licensed under the LGPL Version 2 or greater per the DESCRIPTION file,
but contains no copy of the LGPL notice, or any copyright notice. I've
grown accustomed to paying attention to copyright and licensing as a
Debian package maintain
10 matches
Mail list logo
