mzukisi.gw...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings
I am attempting to load exTremes and this is what I get...
*> utils:::menuInstallPkgs()
--- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session ---
trying URL '
http://cran.uk.r-project.org/bin/windows/contrib/2.9/extRemes_1.60.zip'
Content type 'appli
This isn't a one-way street, as it means that some erroneous calls
will not be detected, and code written to take advantage of this will
only work under R >= 2.10.0.
I think we should probably insist that one of x1 and y1 is supplied:
if both are omitted arrows() would give a warning, but segm
This was a missing PROTECT() in do_order.
But I'll echo what Simon Urbanek said: don't do that but rather use
the documented ways to re-encode the file as you read it. (Latin-1
used to be needed for collation on Mac OS X as C-level collation in
UTF-8 was completely broken -- but we have worke
The functions metrop and temper in the mcmc package have a debug = FALSE
argument that when TRUE adds a lot of debugging information to the returned
list. This is absolutely necessary to test the functions, because one
generally knows nothing about the simulated distribution except what what
one l
On 10/5/2009 1:50 PM, Charles Geyer wrote:
The functions metrop and temper in the mcmc package have a debug = FALSE
argument that when TRUE adds a lot of debugging information to the returned
list. This is absolutely necessary to test the functions, because one
generally knows nothing about the
There are several help files in the R sources that
describe concepts and not particular R objects.
E.g., help(Methods), help(Syntax), and help(regex).
They don't have a docType entry and their alias
entries do not refer to functions. Perhaps your
debugging documentation could go into a similar
*.
Hi All,
I'm interested in putting some unit tests into an R package I'm
building. I have seen assorted things such as Runit library, svUnit
library, packages
with 'tests' directories, etc
I grep'd "unit test" through the writing R extensions manual but didn't find
anything. Are there any sugges
There are many arguments in many functions that are rarely used. I
prefer to see it all documented in the help pages. If they are not
documented in the help pages (and sometimes even if they are), a user
who wants them can invent other ways to get similar information with
much greater effort,
On 10/5/2009 3:01 PM, Blair Christian wrote:
Hi All,
I'm interested in putting some unit tests into an R package I'm
building. I have seen assorted things such as Runit library, svUnit
library, packages
with 'tests' directories, etc
I grep'd "unit test" through the writing R extensions manual
Hi,
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Blair Christian
wrote:
> I'm interested in putting some unit tests into an R package I'm
> building. I have seen assorted things such as Runit library, svUnit
> library, packages
> with 'tests' directories, etc
>
> I grep'd "unit test" through the writing R e
Seth
I should look at RUnit more carefully sometime, but having had my own system in
place from much earlier, I've never made the move. Basically I just use files
in the tests/ directory which are run by a makefile in the package directory
above. Roughly, this just means that I can run the test
I put unit test in the examples, using "\dontshow" to hide "stopifnot".
Many help pages I've written contain code like the following:
A <- functionDocumentedHere()
B <- manuallyComputedAnswer
\dontshow{stopifnot(}
all.equal(A, B)
\dontshow{)}
I think it helps the documentation to incl
Full_Name: Jean Lobry
Version: 2.9.0
OS: i386-apple-darwin8.11.1
Submission from: (NULL) (83.197.82.45)
Dear R-core,
I have posted http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/Rhelp08/2009-September/212688.html";>this
on R-help, and then http://finzi.psych.upenn.edu/R/R-devel/2009-September/054929.html";>that
o
In the R-2-9-branch (svn revision 49914, 2009-09-24), R's configure
script has an "--enable-threads" option. But, does it do anything
useful? When I use "--enable-threads=posix", some of the configure
output changes slightly, but it seems to have no effect on the actual
link commands used when bu
On 05/10/2009 4:39 PM, spencerg wrote:
I put unit test in the examples, using "\dontshow" to hide "stopifnot".
Many help pages I've written contain code like the following:
A <- functionDocumentedHere()
B <- manuallyComputedAnswer
\dontshow{stopifnot(}
all.equal(A, B)
\dontshow{)}
This wi
Hi, Duncan:
Thanks for the warning. Can you give me a hint of which release
might require this? In particular, will it be R 2.10.0, coming quite
soon?
Thanks,
Spencer
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 05/10/2009 4:39 PM, spencerg wrote:
I put unit test in the examples, using "\
On 05/10/2009 6:06 PM, spencerg wrote:
Hi, Duncan:
Thanks for the warning. Can you give me a hint of which release
might require this? In particular, will it be R 2.10.0, coming quite
soon?
The alpha version of 2.10.0 lets this pass, and I can't see changing
that now. But 2.11.0
Full_Name: Rich Calaway
Version: R 2.9.2
OS: Windows Vista
Submission from: (NULL) (65.47.30.18)
Try this:
x <- rnorm(25)
y <- rnorm(25)*1i
z <- x+y
str(z)
str(y)
When I try this, I see the following:
> str(z)
cplx [1:25] 0.0102+ 0.9463-1 -1.+ ...
> str(y)
cplx [1:25] 0+0.0975i 0-1.5060i
It seems like a recent trend in R has been to make character vectors
and factors almost equivalent (apart from the way that factors always
remember their original range). There are a few exceptions:
* summary.character != summary.factor
* table(x, exclude = NULL) != table(factor(x), exclude=NUL
Hi,
I am the writer of svUnit. My initial goal was to build functions on top
of RUnit which is older, and certainly deserves all the credit for core
test unit functions. Unfortunately, the way RUnit is working internally
did not allowed me to build the extensions I needed.
Now, as Seth already t
> Now, as Seth already told, there are several functions in svUnit that
> ease interactive use of the tests in an R session. What he did not told
> is that RUnit has some nice code coverage functions that svUnit does not
> have.
What are those? I've skimmed through the documentation and couldn't
s
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, hadley wickham wrote:
>> Now, as Seth already told, there are several functions in svUnit that
>> ease interactive use of the tests in an R session. What he did not told
>> is that RUnit has some nice code coverage functions that svUnit does not
>> have.
>
> What ar
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Peter Cowan wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, hadley wickham wrote:
>>> Now, as Seth already told, there are several functions in svUnit that
>>> ease interactive use of the tests in an R session. What he did not told
>>> is that RUnit has some nice code cov
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:00 PM, hadley wickham wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:48 PM, Peter Cowan wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:44 PM, hadley wickham wrote:
Now, as Seth already told, there are several functions in svUnit that
ease interactive use of the tests in an R session. W
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:33 PM, hadley wickham wrote:
> It seems like a recent trend in R has been to make character vectors
> and factors almost equivalent (apart from the way that factors always
> remember their original range). There are a few exceptions:
A related issue is that modeling func
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Andrew Piskorski wrote:
In the R-2-9-branch (svn revision 49914, 2009-09-24), R's configure
script has an "--enable-threads" option. But, does it do anything
useful? When I use "--enable-threads=posix", some of the configure
output changes slightly, but it seems to have no
26 matches
Mail list logo
