Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,
I've tried several times yesterday to build R-devel and I consistently
get this error when I "make" :
mkdir -p -- ../../../library/base/R
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library/profile'
make[3]: Entering directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library/base'
bui
On 09/22/2009 09:17 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Romain Francois wrote:
Hello,
I've tried several times yesterday to build R-devel and I consistently
get this error when I "make" :
mkdir -p -- ../../../library/base/R
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/R-devel/src/library/profile'
make[3]: Entering
Full_Name: Dennis Ristuccia
Version: R version 2.9.2 (2009-08-24)
OS: Ubuntu Hardy 8.04
Submission from: (NULL) (18.157.249.21)
Hi guys,
I'm running into an issue with the python-rpy ubuntu hardy package.
Heres the output:
r...@tak ~# python
Python 2.5.2 (r252:60911, Jul 22 2009, 15:35:03)
[G
R 2.9.1 and 2.9.2 report "not found" when I try to save .Random.seed for
later restore, however, the manual ?.Random.seed says that it still exists.
--
Andreas Westfeld, 0432 01CC F511 9E2B 0B57 5993 0B22 98F8 4AD8 EEEA
HTW Dresden, Fakultät Informatik/Mathematik
Informatikrecht/Informationssicher
Hi,
I've been calling the function "source" (package base) from Tinn-R editor to
send files, marked blocks and selections to R interpreter because it avoids a
lot of problems related with input/output synchronization in the Rgui output!
The new RGedit plugin is also using this function in this wa
files.Rd has the following typo, line 57:
LIBK points to an actual file ...
should be LINK
Stephen
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Romain Francois wrote:
> However, this might be relevant about my setting, I have the
> "R_KEEP_PKG_SOURCE" environment variable set to "yes". And if I set it
> to "no" it builds correctly.
AHA! Yes, that makes sense
R_KEEP_PKG_SOURCE=yes make
breaks for me too with the unprotect_ptr message (S
On 09/22/2009 11:25 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Romain Francois wrote:
However, this might be relevant about my setting, I have the
"R_KEEP_PKG_SOURCE" environment variable set to "yes". And if I set it
to "no" it builds correctly.
AHA! Yes, that makes sense
R_KEEP_PKG_SOURCE=yes make
breaks
On 22/09/2009 5:30 AM, Romain Francois wrote:
On 09/22/2009 11:25 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Romain Francois wrote:
However, this might be relevant about my setting, I have the
"R_KEEP_PKG_SOURCE" environment variable set to "yes". And if I set it
to "no" it builds correctly.
AHA! Yes, that ma
On 09/22/2009 11:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 22/09/2009 5:30 AM, Romain Francois wrote:
On 09/22/2009 11:25 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Romain Francois wrote:
However, this might be relevant about my setting, I have the
"R_KEEP_PKG_SOURCE" environment variable set to "yes". And if I set it
On 22/09/2009 5:50 AM, Romain Francois wrote:
On 09/22/2009 11:41 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 22/09/2009 5:30 AM, Romain Francois wrote:
On 09/22/2009 11:25 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Romain Francois wrote:
However, this might be relevant about my setting, I have the
"R_KEEP_PKG_SOURCE" envi
On 21/09/2009 1:25 PM, andreas.westf...@htw-dresden.de wrote:
R 2.9.1 and 2.9.2 report "not found" when I try to save .Random.seed for
later restore, however, the manual ?.Random.seed says that it still exists.
.Random.seed is created the first time you use the random number
generators. I'm g
I would find that useful too particularly for running long output from Stangle.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 9:22 PM, Jose Claudio Faria
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been calling the function "source" (package base) from Tinn-R editor to
> send files, marked blocks and selections to R interpreter because it
Dear r-devel members,
My Rcmdr package "depends" on several other packages (tcltk, grDevices,
utils, and car) and "suggests" a number of others (abind, aplpack,
colorspace, effects, foreign, grid, Hmisc, lattice, leaps, lmtest, MASS,
mgcv, multcomp, nlme, nnet, relimp, rgl, and RODBC). The reason
A couple weeks ago I posted a message on this topic to r-help, the response
was that this seemed like odd behavior, and that I ought to post it to one
of the developer lists. I posted to r-sig-mixed-models, but didn't get any
response. So, with good intentions, I decided to try posting once more,
I believe this is fixed now (as of r49786). The problem is that the
parse code does bad things with the protection stack -- rather than
pairing PROTECT with UNPROTECT, it does bulk unprotects by saving and
restoring the stack pointer -- and in the new code the
ParseState.SrcFile ended up getti
Thanks. Works for me also now.
On 09/22/2009 06:17 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
I believe this is fixed now (as of r49786). The problem is that the
parse code does bad things with the protection stack -- rather than
pairing PROTECT with UNPROTECT, it does bulk unprotects by saving and
restoring th
timothy_hand...@nps.gov wrote:
A couple weeks ago I posted a message on this topic to r-help, the response
was that this seemed like odd behavior, and that I ought to post it to one
of the developer lists. I posted to r-sig-mixed-models, but didn't get any
response. So, with good intentions, I
John Fox wrote:
Dear r-devel members,
My Rcmdr package "depends" on several other packages (tcltk, grDevices,
utils, and car) and "suggests" a number of others (abind, aplpack,
colorspace, effects, foreign, grid, Hmisc, lattice, leaps, lmtest, MASS,
mgcv, multcomp, nlme, nnet, relimp, rgl, and
Create a package called RcmdrInstall, say, with no content and have it
depend on Rcmdr. RcmdrInstall would have all packages as dependencies
while Rcmdr would only have the essential packages as dependencies.
Install RcmdrInstall. That would also force Rcmdr to be installed.
Now issue:
libr
Dear Uwe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de]
> Sent: September-22-09 2:17 PM
> To: John Fox
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Rcmdr package dependencies
>
>
>
> John Fox wrote:
> > Dear r-devel members,
> >
> > My Rcmdr package
Dear Gabor,
I thought of this solution but rejected it, perhaps too hastily, because it
seemed awkward. I suppose, however, that since the Rcmdr package would be
unchanged, a user could choose to install it as at present with
dependencies=TRUE, or alternatively install the RcmdrInstall package and
To make it foolproof at Rcmdr's load time (i.e. in the .onLoad
function) you could check whether RcmdrInstall was available (not
necessarily loaded, just available). If not, then you could issue a
message asking the user to install it. This would help the user avoid
the situation where they insta
Dear Gabor,
At present, the Rcmdr package checks whether its dependencies are present
and offers to install them if they are not. Also at present, it installs its
dependencies with dep=TRUE, but that could be changed. I suppose that I
could simply rely on this mechanism rather than have a separate
John Fox wrote:
Dear Uwe,
-Original Message-
From: Uwe Ligges [mailto:lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de]
Sent: September-22-09 2:17 PM
To: John Fox
Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] Rcmdr package dependencies
John Fox wrote:
Dear r-devel members,
My Rcmdr package "depends
* On 2009-09-22 at 20:16 +0200 Uwe Ligges wrote:
> no, this is not possible.
>
> Consider your package A (or Rcmdr) suggests B that suggests C.
> Then A::foo uses the function B::bar which only works if C::dep is
> present. B works essentially without C but it requires C just to
> make bar work. T
Dear Seth,
> -Original Message-
> From: Seth Falcon [mailto:s...@userprimary.net]
> Sent: September-22-09 5:13 PM
> To: Uwe Ligges
> Cc: John Fox; r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Rcmdr package dependencies
>
> * On 2009-09-22 at 20:16 +0200 Uwe Ligges wrote:
> > no, this is not
John Fox wrote:
Dear Seth,
-Original Message-
From: Seth Falcon [mailto:s...@userprimary.net]
Sent: September-22-09 5:13 PM
To: Uwe Ligges
Cc: John Fox; r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] Rcmdr package dependencies
* On 2009-09-22 at 20:16 +0200 Uwe Ligges wrote:
no, this is no
I hope this is the place for this...
I have to rebuild from scratch under Snow Leopard, and when I
attempted to build R-2.9.1, I get the following results from ./
configure:
checking how to get verbose linking output from fc... configure:
WARNING: compilation failed
checking for Fortran
Jeff,
On Sep 22, 2009, at 6:12 PM, Jeff Hamann wrote:
I hope this is the place for this...
Yes, indeed.
I have to rebuild from scratch under Snow Leopard, and when I
attempted to build R-2.9.1, I get the following results from ./
configure:
checking how to get verbose linking output
30 matches
Mail list logo
