[Rd] make check fails in r49613

Hi, I am reporting what seems to be a trivial error in one of the test files (this has been failing for a few days for me): Collecting examples for package 'tools' Running examples in package 'tools' Error: testing 'tools' failed Execution halted gmake[3]: *** [test-Examples-Base] Error 1 gmake[3

Re: [Rd] Running two R instances at the same time

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Piskorski wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 08:31:18PM +0200, Peter Juhasz wrote: > >> I don't understand how is this possible. Maybe there is an issue of >> thread-safety with the R backend, meaning that the two R *interpreter* >> instances are talking to the

Re: [Rd] [R] Usage of OCaml/R binding.

Hello. Since nobody answered this on R-help@, I thought I'd push it through to r-de...@. By the way, here's the webpage (in french) for the Debian package of Maxence Guesdon's OCaml/R bindings: http://yziquel.homelinux.org/topos/debian-ocamlr.html http://yziquel.homelinux.or

Re: [Rd] make check fails in r49613

I have successfully build r49614 this morning. Have you tried to do a clean build from a fresh source directory? Do you have some library with old packages in your search path? Uwe Ligges Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: Hi, I am reporting what seems to be a trivial error in one of the test file

Re: [Rd] OS X PDF bug (PR#13943)

On Sep 7, 2009, at 4:37 AM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote: > My guess is quartz() and that this is nothing to do with R but with > copying in Mac OS X from a quartz() window. Saving to a file from the quartz window also produces a PDF that is viewable but not printable by Preview, and Acrobat too. I

Re: [Rd] make check fails in r49613

On 08/09/2009 6:32 AM, Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: 2009/9/8 Uwe Ligges wrote: I have successfully build r49614 this morning. Have you tried to do a clean build from a fresh source directory? Do you have some library with old packages in your search path? Ah, thanks for this. After removing libra

Re: [Rd] make check fails in r49613

Hiroyuki Kawakatsu wrote: 2009/9/8 Uwe Ligges wrote: I have successfully build r49614 this morning. Have you tried to do a clean build from a fresh source directory? Do you have some library with old packages in your search path? Ah, thanks for this. After removing library/ and rebuilding, I

Re: [Rd] make check fails in r49613

2009/9/8 Uwe Ligges wrote: > I have successfully build r49614 this morning. Have you tried to do a clean > build from a fresh source directory? Do you have some library with old > packages in your search path? Ah, thanks for this. After removing library/ and rebuilding, I now pass -(g)make check-.

Re: [Rd] Reissue: Base "Object" class to use in S4 slot specification

On Sep 8, 2009, at 12:39 , Simon Urbanek wrote: On Sep 8, 2009, at 12:14 , Patrick Aboyoun wrote: This is a reissue of a question I had asked a few weeks ago to see if anyone had any thoughts on the matter. I am looking to have slot in an S4 class definition that can take any (S3 or S4)

[Rd] Reissue: Base "Object" class to use in S4 slot specification

This is a reissue of a question I had asked a few weeks ago to see if anyone had any thoughts on the matter. I am looking to have slot in an S4 class definition that can take any (S3 or S4) object. The ANY class seemed to be a good candidate, but the is() function definition performs an S3Case

Re: [Rd] question about ... passed to two different functions

> -Original Message- > From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org > [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Charles Geyer > Sent: Monday, September 07, 2009 1:39 PM > To: r-devel@r-project.org > Subject: Re: [Rd] question about ... passed to two different functions > > Many thanks to

Re: [Rd] Reissue: Base "Object" class to use in S4 slot specification

On Sep 8, 2009, at 12:14 , Patrick Aboyoun wrote: This is a reissue of a question I had asked a few weeks ago to see if anyone had any thoughts on the matter. I am looking to have slot in an S4 class definition that can take any (S3 or S4) object. The ANY class seemed to be a good candidat

Re: [Rd] Reissue: Base "Object" class to use in S4 slot specification

Simon, I don't want to get too deep into specific implementations here so we don't get stuck in the weeds. (The original issue started with a typed list class infrastructure in BioC's IRanges package that checked to see if the elements conformed to the expected class.) To make this issue as n

[Rd] Difference between is(<>, "ANY") and extends(<>, "ANY")

Forgive the multiple posts, but I am resending a issue under a new subject so it doesn't get lost. There is inconsistent behavior between is and extends for class ANY. All classes (even non-existent ones) extend ANY according to methods::extends, but only S4 objects are of class ANY according t

[Rd] Simple ./config option to disable networking

Is there a simple ./configure option to turn off the networking code (e.g. I want to override HAVE_SOCKETS). Clearly it could be done editing configure.ac or setting CFLAGS but I was looking for something more elegant. Thanks, Bob [[alternative HTML version deleted]]