> "SW" == Stephen Weigand
> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:33:05 -0500 writes:
SW> I wonder if the 'sep' argument in reshape() is being ignored
SW> unintentionally:
No. It is used much differently than you *assume* it's used.
As always, ?reshape contains the answer.
SW> #
> "BB" == Ben Bolker
> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:08:45 + (UTC) writes:
BB> Martin Maechler stat.math.ethz.ch> writes:
>> >> But lgamma(x) is log(abs(gamma(x))), so it looks okay to me.
>> >>
>> >> Duncan Murdoch
>>
TH> Oops, yes! That's what comes of talkin
> "WK" == Wacek Kusnierczyk
> on Tue, 31 Mar 2009 21:58:52 +0200 writes:
WK> Martin Maechler wrote:
>>
>> >>
>> >> and then be helpful to the R community and send a bug report
>> >> *with* a patch if {as in this case} you are able to...
>> >>
>> >> Well,
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Stephen Weigand wrote:
I wonder if the 'sep' argument in reshape() is being ignored
unintentionally:
## From example(reshape)
df <- data.frame(id=rep(1:4,rep(2,4)),
visit=I(rep(c("Before","After"),4)),
x=rnorm(4), y=runif(4))
reshape(df, t
> Wacek Kusnierczyk
> on Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:39:58 +0100 writes:
> (this post suggests a patch to the sources, so i allow myself to divert
> it to r-devel)
> Bert Gunter wrote:
>> x a numeric vector, matrix or data frame.
>> y NULL (default) or a vector, matrix o
Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> WK> i attach the patch post for reference. note that you need to fix all
> of
> WK> the functions in duplicated.R that share the buggy code. (yes, this
> was
> WK> another thread; i submitted a bug report, and then sent a follow-up
> WK> post with a p
Thanks Gabor, Duncan, and Dirk,
for your replies.
Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> We need to make sure we understand the implications
> for packages developed under the other major version
> control systems like git, bzr and hg.
Ok for this --- of course it would even be "greater" to have
a universa
Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> Your patch is basically only affecting the default
> method = "pearson". For (most) other cases, 'y = NULL' would
> still remain *the* way to save computations, unless we'd start
> to use an R-level equivalent [which I think does not exist] of
> your C trick (DATAPT
Martin Maechler wrote:
>
> Using 'bug' (without any qualifying "?" or "possible" ..)
> in the subject line is still a bit unfriendly...
>
is suggesting that a poster includes 'excel bug' in the subject line [1]
friendly??
vQ
[1] https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2009-March/190119.html
Dear list,
Sorry for the noise but I have a question regarding the license used in
RUnit [1], I contacted the maintainer( burgerm -at- users -dot-
sourceforge -dot- net ) on March 20th but I have received no answer.
Could anyone help to solve this question ?
Basically, my problem is that the web
Hi,
it seems that there is a minor typo in the last line of the "Details" section.
Shouldn't "model.frame" be "model.extract" in the sentence
"model.weights is slightly different from model.frame(, "weights") in not
naming the
vector it returns."
?
Christian
__
I've sent a fixed version 2.35-4 to CRAN. It turned out to be a fairly simple
change.
-thomas
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009, Marc Schwartz wrote:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 5:55 PM, Marc Schwartz wrote:
Hi all,
Using:
R version 2.8.1 Patched (2009-03-07 r48068)
on OSX (10.5.6) with survival versi
Eric,
On Mar 31, 2009, at 10:50 PM, Eric wrote:
I am trying to build a C application where I need to compute some
statistics to take decisions about the direction to give to a user,
knowing his/her habits. Because I used R back at school, I thought I
can use some of his functions in my app
The documentation for assignment says:
In all the assignment operator expressions, 'x' can be a name or
an expression defining a part of an object to be replaced (e.g.,
'z[[1]]'). A syntactic name does not need to be quoted, though it
can be (preferably by backticks).
But the
On Apr 1, 2009, at 15:49 , Stavros Macrakis wrote:
The documentation for assignment says:
In all the assignment operator expressions, 'x' can be a name or
an expression defining a part of an object to be replaced (e.g.,
'z[[1]]'). A syntactic name does not need to be quoted, thoug
Hi,
Try to contact the other authors... I spent 5 min on google and found
this http://www.uni-konstanz.de/FuF/Verwiss/koenig/
Regards
Christophe
Le 1 avr. 09 à 10:58, Pierre-Yves a écrit :
Dear list,
Sorry for the noise but I have a question regarding the license used
in
RUnit [1], I
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Simon Urbanek
wrote:
>
> On Apr 1, 2009, at 15:49 , Stavros Macrakis wrote:
>
> The documentation for assignment says:
>>
>>In all the assignment operator expressions, 'x' can be a name or
>>an expression defining a part of an object to be replaced (e.g.,
>
Stavros Macrakis wrote:
> The documentation for assignment says:
>
> In all the assignment operator expressions, 'x' can be a name or
> an expression defining a part of an object to be replaced (e.g.,
> 'z[[1]]'). A syntactic name does not need to be quoted, though it
> can be
I got RGoogleDocs to work. It works on documents but not on spreadsheets.
I get the following error.
getDocs(con, what
="http://docs.google.com/feeds/documents/private/full/-/spreadsheet";)
assignment of an object of class "NULL" is not valid for slot "access"
in an object of class "GoogleSpreads
Does it have anything to do with the following message when I load RGoogleDocs?
The following object(s) are masked from package:methods :
getAccess
Farrel Buchinsky
Google Voice Tel: (412) 567-7870
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 18:36, Farrel Buchinsky wrote:
> I got RGoogleDocs t
You might try my development version which I put at
http://www.omegahat.org/Prerelease/RGoogleDocs_0.2-0.tar.gz
I am not certain if there are any substantive differences with the
one in the Omegahat repository, but it works for me with a document
and a spreadsheet in an Google Docs account.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Wacek Kusnierczyk <
waclaw.marcin.kusnierc...@idi.ntnu.no> wrote:
> Stavros Macrakis wrote:
> ...
> i think this concords with the documentation in the sense that in an
> assignment a string can work as a name. note that
>
>`foo bar` = 1
>is.name(`foo`)
>
22 matches
Mail list logo