Hi,
I don't know the answer but here is how I would try to get it from the
source:
$ cd R-devel/src
$ grep -R "R Software" *
Binary file library/grDevices/src/grDevices.so matches
library/grDevices/src/devPS.c:fprintf(fp, "Creator: R Software\n");
Binary file library/grDevices/src/dev
Thank you, Peter;
I just have committed the fix for the typo.
(The inline patch was perfectly sufficient)
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
> "PC" == Peter Cowan
> on Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:02:28 -0800 writes:
PC> Here is a patch for a small typo in the description of do.call()
PC>
As I am wanting to generate a beta, then I created a function in C to
generate a beta, but the problem appears when I go to compile
My function in C is
#include
#include
#include
void F77_SUB(myrbeta)(double* px)
{
   GetRNGstate();
   *px = rbeta(1.00,3.00);
   PutRNGstate();
}
There are lots of invalid characters in your mail, but Fortran code
starts in column 7 and that is what the compiler is telling you you
have not done. (Some dialects will allow tabs instead, but I see no
sing of those either.)
If you are that unfamiliar with Fortran, why not just use C?
On S
Sorry, my example was just to give you a rough idea of how to do
this. Here is an example that works.
myrandom.c:
#include
#include
void F77_SUB(fseedi)(void)
{
GetRNGstate();
}
void F77_SUB(fseedo)(void)
{
PutRNGstate();
}
void F77_SUB(myrbeta)(double* px, double* pa, double* pb)
Hi,
For extended glms such as gams, gnm or other distributions
such as negative binomial, would there need to be a separate simulate
method?
Or, could the current framework, rather than stopping with an error
look for the appropriate model matrix, coefficients, distribution
function and family obje
> "NicLK" == Nicholas Lewin-Koh
> on Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:34:45 -0800 writes:
NicLK> Hi, For extended glms such as gams, gnm or other
NicLK> distributions such as negative binomial, would there
NicLK> need to be a separate simulate method?
Not necessarily, as I said, th
Hi,
Well, my question wasn't that clear :-), but yes you mostly answered it.
I guess
the one case I would be concerned is in Heather's code, where the
distribution
to simulate from is chosen, that seemed to be hard coded. So if
I built a family object, say for a model that assumes errors from a zi
Wacek Kusnierczyk idi.ntnu.no> writes:
>
> you can always try to get hold of the extensive nag fortran libraries:
>
> http://www.nag.co.uk/numeric/fl/FLdescription.asp
>
> comsider also 'numerical recipes' by press et al., of which there are
> fortran, c, and c++ editions (i think there was a
Ben Bolker ufl.edu> writes:
> > vQ
>
> If one can get the R routines to work, I think they have some
> advantages over NAG and Numerical Recipes routines:
>
> * source code is freely redistributable
> * I can't really claim expertise, but I believe there
> has been some controversy (see t
On Sat, 14 Feb 2009, Nicholas Lewin-Koh wrote:
Well, my question wasn't that clear :-), but yes you mostly answered
it. I guess the one case I would be concerned is in Heather's code,
where the distribution to simulate from is chosen, that seemed to be
hard coded.
Rather, all known glm famil
It seems (based on the NEWS file and on output from R CMD check) that
we may no longer use SET_VECTOR_ELT on STRSXPs. So I guess that
section 5.14 of R-extensions needs to be updated, the current phrasing
is
"By default a certain amount of misuse is allowed where the internal
representation
12 matches
Mail list logo
