I can't find any R roadmap. Is it available somewhere ?
Etienne
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Roadmap---tp21791647p21791647.html
Sent from the R devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
I am experimenting with exporting pointers to some of the functions in
deSolve so that other packages may import them, using the
'R_RegisterCCallable' mechanism. I have added a header file and some
other C code in inst/include of the deSolve source package that need to
be accessible to other pack
Hello, All:
What would you say is the best succinct reference to cite on use
of generic functions, especially S3 generics?
I want to add an appropriate citation on this to a forthcoming
book in the Springer "useR!" series (discussing the use of the 'fda'
package, which uses the S3 stan
I was looking for something like that (as an example)
http://wiki.inkscape.org/wiki/index.php/Roadmap
I wanted to know where R was going in general. Like if there was a
target for 3.0, etc. Maybe it would better apply to RGui, I admit I have
some difficulties to distinguish one project from th
Where did you get the idea that R CMD INSTALL is reading .Rprofile?
(AFAIR it does so only to find the installation library, as R CMD
INSTALL --help says it will.)
You need to set R_LIBS in the environment to get the library path you
want. This is not specific to 'LinkingTo'.
On Mon, 2 Feb
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, Etienne B. Racine wrote:
I can't find any R roadmap. Is it available somewhere ?
What are you expecting to find?
There is a lot of information on the developer site
(developer.r-rproject.org), and planned changes in the next 2.x.0
release are in the NEWS file in the SVN
(I just realized that when "they" upgraded my mail program, "they" reset
my preferences to send html and text for internet mail. I have fixed
the preferences to text only, and apologize).
Well, where would I get the idea it was NOT reading .Rprofile, since it
clearly IS reading Rprofile.site? How
Hi,
recently I have started working with R (v. 2.7.2), and I have been using
R's internal ARIMA_Like() function (from the "stats" package) to
estimate some ARIMA models. In particular, I use ARIMA_Like() in a
function "fn()" that I feed to the optim() method; the main goal is to
find optimal ARIMA
Hi,
in R v2.8.1 patched (2008-12-22 r47296) the following works:
> sprintf("%#x", 1)
[1] "0x1"
whereas in R v2.9.0 devel (2009-01-08 r47515) it gives:
> sprintf("%#x", 1);
Error in sprintf("%#x", 1) :
use format %f, %e, %g or %a for numeric objects
Not sure if this was an intended move or no
