I could not find a package to run panel data unit root tests in R (there's a
STATA module, though - PANELUNIT- and routines for Sarno and Taylor's MADF
test, Levin-Lin-Chu's test, Im-Pesaran-Shin's Test, etc, to do this).
Hence, I am toying with the idea of having a go at writing up one for R,
'The R Inferno' page 93 and page 99.
Patrick Burns
patr...@burns-stat.com
+44 (0)20 8525 0696
http://www.burns-stat.com
(home of "The R Inferno" and "A Guide for the Unwilling S User")
twoutop...@gmail.com wrote:
The length() of a POSIXlt object is given as 9 regardless of the actual
length. F
Dear list-member,
I am currently developing a package with S4 classes. The NAMESPACE and
DESCRIPTION is printed below. Within this package I have set a method
"residuals" for two classes. In version 2.8.1 these two are reported whereas in
R-Devel (2009-01-28 r47766). What have I missed? What ha
Sorry for bothering the list one more time. When I run the code with RGui.exe
the methods are shown in both versions of R and everything is fine. However,
there is a difference whence the showMethods("residuals") is invoked via
Rterm.exe. Here, neither under 2.8.1 nor R-Devel are the methods rep
I don't believe this is Rgui vs Rterm either. More likely it is in
the startup files for the two sessions, e.g. the library search paths.
Try using --vanilla.
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009, Pfaff, Bernhard Dr. wrote:
Sorry for bothering the list one more time. When I run the code with RGui.exe the met
Jose,
this is not the list for asking questions like this. You should ask on
R-help or (alternatively!) R-SIG-Finance would be a good place to ask.
I could not find a package to run panel data unit root tests in R
(there's a STATA module, though - PANELUNIT- and routines for Sarno and
Taylor
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> What did your actual application do? This seems a very strange thing to
> do, and the segfault is in trying to construct the traceback.
>
> Only by using do.call on the object (and not even by name) do I get this
> error. E.g.
>
> `[.d
On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:30 , Christian Brechbühler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Prof Brian Ripley >wrote:
What did your actual application do? This seems a very strange
thing to
do, and the segfault is in trying to construct the traceback.
Only by using do.call on the object (an
Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Jan 30, 2009, at 10:30 , Christian Brechbühler wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Prof Brian Ripley
wrote:
What did your actual application do? This seems a very strange
thing to
do, and the segfault is in trying to construct the traceback.
Only by using do.c
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 01/29/2009 07:14:11 PM:
> On 29/01/2009 5:22 PM, Nicholas L Crookston wrote:
> > I rebuilt a test version of my yaImpute package using Uwe Ligges'
windows
> > build service.
> > I got this reply: Check result: OK
> > R version 2.9.0 Under development (unstable) (2009-01-2
On 1/30/2009 2:22 PM, Nicholas L Crookston wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 01/29/2009 07:14:11 PM:
On 29/01/2009 5:22 PM, Nicholas L Crookston wrote:
> I rebuilt a test version of my yaImpute package using Uwe Ligges'
windows
> build service.
> I got this reply: Check result: OK
> R version
Duncan Murdoch wrote on 01/30/2009 12:04:56 PM:
>
> Okay, I think I see now. I installed your package version 1.0-8 in
> R-devel (to be 2.9.0), and the ?TallyLake man page looks fine to me in
> text mode, looks slightly funny in HTML (with the labels one line above
> the thing they're describi
On 28 January 2009 at 22:26, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| RDieHarder fails its regression tests on x86_64 (aka "amd64") at CRAN (using
| Debian), and I see the same on Ubuntu 8.10 in 64 bit. No issues on 32bit.
|
| One odd thing is that the program behaves well if run via
|
| R --no-save <
13 matches
Mail list logo
