Hi there,
I have got more or less the same problem. I actually can not do anything in
the R editor - as soon as I try to change something it crashes.
Has anyone been able to solve this problem?
I can send the full crash report if someone is interested.
gr.
Herwig
Below my systems details:
Dat
Full_Name: Søren Faurby
Version: 2.4.1 and 2.7.2
OS:
Submission from: (NULL) (192.38.46.92)
There appear to be a bug in the estimation of significance in the binomial model
in GLM. This bug apparently appears when the correlation between two variables
is to strong.
Such as this dummy example
c(
On Jan 5, 2009, at 17:44 , herwig wrote:
Hi there,
I have got more or less the same problem. I actually can not do
anything in
the R editor - as soon as I try to change something it crashes.
Has anyone been able to solve this problem?
No, since as you can see it is filed under "not-repro
I'm testing out some changes to survreg and got the following output, the
likes of which I've never seen before:
--
R version 2.7.1 (2008-06-23)
Copyright (C) 2008 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
R
This is a (too-little) known phenomenon: the problem is the low power of
the Wald test in certain circumstances, and not the R implementation.
You can look it up in MASS (the book) pp.197-9.
Can I ask how you 'knew for certain' what this should do? From the FAQ:
But be sure you know for cer
soren.fau...@biology.au.dk wrote:
> Full_Name: Søren Faurby
> Version: 2.4.1 and 2.7.2
> OS:
> Submission from: (NULL) (192.38.46.92)
>
>
> There appear to be a bug in the estimation of significance in the binomial
> model
> in GLM. This bug apparently appears when the correlation between two v
This indicates that your PROTECTs and UNPROTECTs are out of balance (by
one, looking at the numbers) in the .Call (which I assume is to your own
code?).
On Tue, 6 Jan 2009, Terry Therneau wrote:
I'm testing out some changes to survreg and got the following output, the
likes of which I've neve
Brian,
Thank you. This explains why it works in Splus: PROTECT is a null macro
there, so I wouldn't have caught the miscount.
Terry
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
