Simon Urbanek wrote:
>
> It's ok to use a package built for 2.8.0 in 2.8.1 but not vice versa. It
> is rare, but it has happened before that a bugfix or visibility change
> adds a symbol in x.y.1 that was not there in x.y.0. Then if your package
> checks for that particular feature and uses it y
The following code works in Splus but not in R
coxph <- function(formula, data, weights, subset, na.action,
init, control, method= c("efron", "breslow", "exact"),
singular.ok =TRUE, robust=FALSE,
model=FALSE, x=FALSE, y=TRUE, ...) {
method <- match.arg(method)
Ca
In a few of my test scripts for the survival code I expect warning messages
(I actually try to trigger a couple). Using R BATCH infile outfile these
messages don't end up in outfile, where I can compare them to what was
expected. I don't see an option to change this.
R < infile >& outfile wor
On Thu, 25 Dec 2008, Terry Therneau wrote:
The following code works in Splus but not in R
coxph <- function(formula, data, weights, subset, na.action,
init, control, method= c("efron", "breslow", "exact"),
singular.ok =TRUE, robust=FALSE,
model=FALSE, x=FALSE, y=TRUE, .
