I find it easier to use S3 methods for cbind and rbind even for S4 classes. The
reason is that first you won't have different classes in the signature for
cbind/rbind and second is that ... signatures are only allowed if ALL arguments
are of the same class, whereas setGeneric("cbind") will force
Simon Urbanek wrote:
> FWIW: technically, you don't have to match the patch level version.
> Although default DLL checks usually require perfect match, it should
> be safe to require that R version lies in [x.y.z, x.y+1.0) where
> x.y.z is the R version that the interfacing DLL was compiled agains
On Tue, 23 Dec 2008, Thomas Baier wrote:
Simon Urbanek wrote:
FWIW: technically, you don't have to match the patch level version.
Although default DLL checks usually require perfect match, it should
be safe to require that R version lies in [x.y.z, x.y+1.0) where
x.y.z is the R version that th
Full_Name: Gregor Gorjanc
Version: 2.8.0 and above
OS: generic
Submission from: (NULL) (82.192.44.219)
This is just a remainder for a wish to align legend title as
reported and "solved" at
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2008-December/051642.html
Thanks!
Regards, Gregor
__
On Dec 23, 2008, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Baier wrote:
Simon Urbanek wrote:
FWIW: technically, you don't have to match the patch level version.
Although default DLL checks usually require perfect match, it should
be safe to require that R version lies in [x.y.z, x.y+1.0) where
x.y.z is the R versi
