[Rd] Different results between v2.6.1 and 2.7.1 (PR#12579)

2008-08-22 Thread shiun1980
Hello~ When I use R2.6.1, the following work correctly. par(mar=3Dc(4.2,3.1,0.5,0.5), oma=3Dc(2,2,2,2)) boxplot(count ~ spray, col =3D "lightgray") box("inner", lty=3D"dotted", col=3D"red") box("outer", lty=3D"solid", col=3D"green") =20 But when I use R2.7.1, the outer region seems too large

Re: [Rd] Different results between v2.6.1 and 2.7.1 (PR#12579)

2008-08-22 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
You haven't told us the graphics device or OS used, nor it seems have you taken account of CHANGES IN R VERSION 2.7.0 SIGNIFICANT USER-VISIBLE CHANGES o Considerable efforts have been made to make the default output from graphics devices as similar as possible (a

[Rd] R CMD check warning "no visible binding for global variable" and hasArg()

2008-08-22 Thread Dr. Peter Ruckdeschel
Hi R-devels, latetely I reported having problems with understanding warnings issued by a devel version of R CMD check, which Brian Ripley in his reply https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2008-August/050493.html correctly attributed to my using an outdated version (July 29) --- you really

[Rd] Linking With External Lapack: Segfault

2008-08-22 Thread Imanpreet
Hello All, I have been trying to figure out on linking R with an external lapack. Even though the R-admin recommends against doing so, our requirements force us to link it to an external lapack. I am running configure with the following parameter. *./configure --with-lapack="-L/usr/lib

Re: [Rd] Linking With External Lapack: Segfault

2008-08-22 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Fri, 22 Aug 2008, Imanpreet wrote: Hello All, I have been trying to figure out on linking R with an external lapack. Even though the R-admin recommends against doing so, our requirements force us to link it to an external lapack. I am running configure with the following parameter.

[Rd] save() should not overwrite a file if an error occurs (PR#12583)

2008-08-22 Thread timhesterberg
If save() fails because an object is not found, it should not overwrite an existing file. > a <- 1:9 > save(a, file = "a.rda") > rm(a) > load("a.rda") > a [1] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > rm(a) > save(a, file = "a.rda") Error in save(a, file = "a.rda") : object 'a' not found > load("a.rda") Error

Re: [Rd] save() should not overwrite a file if an error occurs (PR#12583)

2008-08-22 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
I don't know what save() "should" do - your use case is quite special - but I agree it would be better if save() tests for the existence of all object(s) to be saved before opening the connection (and thereby overwrite the existing file). A workaround for you is to do: dummy <- a; save(a, file="a

[Rd] R CMD check problem

2008-08-22 Thread Giles Hooker
I have a query after finding an error running Rtools on a Windows machine. I am trying to build an update to the R fda library using Rtools27 under Windows XP Pro. This is the current fda library on RForge: http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/fda Following R CMD build, R CMD check produces