[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do not change initialize!
As I sat, this is a toy example. In my real example, initialize does a
lot of things like calculation of quality indice (b is not the scare of
a, but B1, B2 and B3 are the the within matrix of A after imputation
with 3 differents methods
In this real example (below), all four of the replicates in one
treatment combination had zero failures, and this produced a very high
standard error in the summary.lm.
=20
Just adding one failure to one of the replicates produced a well-behaved
standard error.
=20
I don't know if this is a bug, bu
Dear R-developers,
=20
according to the "what's new"-section in version R 2.7.0, there has been =
a change in the working of co[rv] and so also in sd and var.
=20
I am afraid, that the use of function sd with option "na.rm=3DT" has not =
been changed appropriately. So the following problem exists w
Full_Name: Luis Lopez-Oliveros
Version: 2.7.0
OS: Mac OS X 10.5.2
Submission from: (NULL) (71.176.115.32)
In R 2.7.0 for Mac OS X, Quartz plots are drawn a little bit off-screen. What
happens is that
the plots appear to be displayed a little below than where they should be in the
Quartz window,
c
NOT a bug.
The estimate of the probability of mi is precisely 1.0 for one cell in
your setup.
The information contributed by that cell has a factor of
p*(1-p) in it, which works out to zero.
The bad behavior of asymptotic methods for binary regressions in such
settings is well known.
H
Just installed the latest R-patched and get the error seen at the end of the
output below. Don't know what to make of this but thought I should report
it. In general, when installing the latest version of R, should one use
R-latest or R-patched? R-latest is stable, but one would assume that
R-patch
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Mark Kimpel wrote:
Just installed the latest R-patched and get the error seen at the end of the
output below. Don't know what to make of this but thought I should report
it.
Nor do we. You have something incorrect in your startup files, but we
don't have those.
In gene
Dear lists:
I am somewhat puzzled by the use of texi2dvi/pdflatex in R2.7.0. When
building EBImage (bioconductor) with 2.7.0 I get the same error both in
Windows and Linux, which reads the following:
** building package indices ...
* DONE (EBImage)
* creating vignettes ... ERROR
/usr/bin/texi
It would be nice if R CMD check ran any file in the tests directory
that has "one of the extensions .R, .S, .q, .r, or .s" - i.e. it
should match the files processed in the R directory.
Hadley
--
http://had.co.nz/
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
I have found the cause of the problem I am having with R-patched. In my
.Rprofile I have a function that loads a bunch of my own functions, one of
which contains the character "(R)". No other version of R I have used since
writing this function ~2 yrs. ago has had a problem reading in this
characte
On Sat, 3 May 2008, hadley wickham wrote:
It would be nice if R CMD check ran any file in the tests directory
that has "one of the extensions .R, .S, .q, .r, or .s" - i.e. it
should match the files processed in the R directory.
Whereas what it is documented in 'Writing R Extensions' is to use
From the NEWS file for R-patchd:
BUG FIXES
o The parser sometimes accepted invalid quoted strings in a UTF-8
locale.
This is likely to be the issue, but we still don't have a reproducible
example (see the posting guide).
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Mark Kimpel wrote:
I have found t
12 matches
Mail list logo
