Calling package.skeleton() results in corrupted Rd-file stub on my
system. It (the file) is contaminated with mass question marks.
This happens only for package Rd file, Rd stubs for *package
functions* are generated nicely.
An example of bad Rd file created by package.skeleton():
\name{cmrutils
Uwe Ligges suggested I post this on R-bugs as a wishlist item with a
proposed patch. R considers zero-length arguments to segments() to be
an error. I would like R to allow this and to return without an
error. It occurs naturally in settings like
valid <- c(FALSE, FALSE, FALSE)
segments(x0[vali
I think we should allow only all-zero arguments (at present any
zero-length argument is an error), as per the R-level proposed code.
arrows() and rect() share the code so it is much cleaner to do this
internally.
Done for R-devel.
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Uwe Ligges sug
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I think we should allow only all-zero arguments (at present any
> zero-length argument is an error), as per the R-level proposed code.
>
> arrows() and rect() share the code so it is much cleaner to do this
> internally.
>
>
There are precedents for not requiring all
I would like to re-emphasize the above points that William makes.
Both projects could benefit a lot from working with each other. A
fair number of people, including Persi Diaconis and Susan Holmes, have
had enthusiastic responses when I mentioned that R was being included
with Sage.
This is a goo
[Taken off R-bugs, at least for now.]
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we should allow only all-zero arguments (at present any
zero-length argument is an error), as per the R-level proposed code.
arrows() and rect() share the code so it is much clean
Hello
I'm sorry if this suggestion/correction was already made but after a
search in devel list I did not find any mention of it.
I would just suggest to add a warning or an exemple for the help-file of
the function unique() like
"Note that unique() compares only identical values. Values which,
On 17-Apr-08 10:44:32, Matthieu Stigler wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm sorry if this suggestion/correction was already made
> but after a search in devel list I did not find any mention
> of it. I would just suggest to add a warning or an exemple
> for the help-file of the function unique() like
>
> "Not
Hello,
One of our packages contains C++ code that needs to be compiled against
2 other packages. So the LinkingTo field in DESCRIPTION looks like this
LinkingTo: FLCore,FLash
Both packages are also in the Depends field.
In R 2.6.2, first thing we noticed was that both names could not have
any s
i am trying to calculate the multi regression for the follwing data
0 1 2 3 7 5 0 4 4 3
0 3 4 5 4 0 5 4 5 4
0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 0
1 0 4 5 6 1 2 3 2 1
keeping Ist column as dependent variable and other as independent
varialbles,how can i do this using lm funciotn in stats please send me the
code
Thank you for the error report. I have made the correction
which will be in HH_2.1-11 which will be posted in a few days.
Rich
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Mike,
I'm also surprised so few reactions have been forthcoming. I saw
William's email shortly after Jan's email about Sage.
Having been involved in the Ryacas project (R to Yacas - Yet Another
Computer Algebra System - with Gabor, Soren and Ayal), I believe in
the tremendous benefits of s
Hi,
Couldn't is.unsorted() bail out immediately here (after comparing
the first 2 elements):
> x <- 2000:1
> system.time(is.unsorted(x), gcFirst=TRUE)
user system elapsed
0.084 0.040 0.124
> x <- 2:1
> system.time(is.unsorted(x), gcFirst=TRUE)
user system elapsed
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Herve Pages wrote:
> Couldn't is.unsorted() bail out immediately here (after comparing
> the first 2 elements):
>
> > x <- 2000:1
> > system.time(is.unsorted(x), gcFirst=TRUE)
> user system elapsed
>0.084 0.040 0.124
>
> > x <- 2:1
> > system.time(
I wouldn't say 'easy', and so I think we need a business case for this
change. (One of the issues is that the internals are used elsewhere and
optimized for inputs without NAs. So we would need to write separate code
if we pass NAs down to C level. As I recall, is.unsorted was a cheap R
inte
Hi,
Thanks for your answers!
No need to change anything. In my case, 'x' is guaranteed to be an integer
vector with no NAs so I can call .Internal(is.unsorted(x)) directly.
BTW, why not make is.unsorted() a little bit more prepared to silly user
input:
> is.unsorted(c(2:5, NA), na.rm=NA)
Hi list,
To call C, I used to use R-extension in windows but I'm moving to unix system
because my PC doesn't have enough memory. My C codes requires to include the
following header files:
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
In windows, I had no problem with it because I s
You should never give full paths in #include statements.
The search paths for include ('header') files are set by the compiler and
supplemented by -I flags on the command line. If your C compiler is
unable to find something is badly wrong, and you need to ask
your 'unix' advisor for help. (B
On Thu, 17 Apr 2008, Herve Pages wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for your answers!
>
> No need to change anything. In my case, 'x' is guaranteed to be an integer
> vector with no NAs so I can call .Internal(is.unsorted(x)) directly.
>
> BTW, why not make is.unsorted() a little bit more prepared to silly u
19 matches
Mail list logo
