Above all,
tnx Ben for taking time to read about my proposal!
2008/3/24, Ben Bolker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo gmail.com> writes:
>
> >
> > I've put online a temp web page with some more info (and sources):
> >
> > http://antonio.fabio.googlepages.com/rgs%3Athergibbssample
Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo gmail.com> writes:
>
I agree that quantitative differences in speed can make
a qualitative difference in the way one works.
Well, I'm somewhat interested, but don't feel that I'm
necessarily appropriate as a mentor. I don't think it would
be terrible if you contac
> Ya. But speeds are rather different.
> I admittely missed a comparison with Umacs in my short demo.
> However, from some early experiments (I'm doing while I'm writing), as
> I suspected, my approach results being many times faster than Umacs,
> even if one doesn't specify samplers as C code
2008/3/24, hadley wickham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Ya. But speeds are rather different.
> > I admittely missed a comparison with Umacs in my short demo.
> > However, from some early experiments (I'm doing while I'm writing), as
> > I suspected, my approach results being many times faster tha
Hey Peter,
sorry for the delay, I was on easter holiday.
> Would it suffice, by the way, to source() a file and introspect upon
> its objects with ls(), formals(), typeof(), mode(), and the like; or
> should we formalize, say, a BNF and write the accompanying automaton?
I agree with Duncan and H
I haven't looked inside to see what is causing this, but there's a big
discontinuity in qgamma:
curve(qgamma(x, shape=19), from=1e-10, to=2e-10)
This appears in both R-patched and R-devel.
Duncan Murdoch
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https:
Hi,
I need to resample from a long string, which is written in many lines with
carriage-return marks at the end of each line. Perhaps because the data
looks like a matrix, using the code: sample(data, 25, replace=T) gives me 25
columns of characters from the data because it is resampling whole co
try this:
y <- as.matrix(read.table(textConnection(
"A C G T T G C A G C
A C G F F F F F F G
A C G S S S S S G A
A C G T T G C A G G
A B B
Hi,
It seems that promptMethods() was changed in revision 44805 to include a
call to "isGenericFunction" that at least as of revision 44861 does not
exist as far as I can tell.
This results in:
could not find function "isGenericFunction"
when evaluating e.g. promptMethods("myGeneric")
Thanks,
M
On 24/03/2008 1:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I haven't looked inside to see what is causing this, but there's a big
> discontinuity in qgamma:
>
> curve(qgamma(x, shape=19), from=1e-10, to=2e-10)
>
> This appears in both R-patched and R-devel.
With debugging turned on, the inaccurate val
I think, as of just 2 revisions later (44863) anyway, that problem has
been fixed. Sitting in the methods/R directory:
grep -nH -e "isGenericFunction" *.R
Grep finished with no matches found at Mon Mar 24 16:55:39
Try updating & see if all is well. (r-devel is a moving target,
particularly a
Full_Name: Mark Bravington
Version: 2.6.2 patched
OS: Windows XP Pro
Submission from: (NULL) (140.79.22.104)
> grep( '[:upper:]', letters, val=T) # shurely shouldn't match anything ??
[1] "e" "p" "r" "u"
The converse ( '[:lower:]' and LETTERS) seems to work OK.
--please do not edit the informat
That is correct: I suspect you meant the character class [[:upper:]]
> grep( '[[:upper:]]', letters, val=TRUE)
character(0)
You asked for matches amongst :upper:, and that is what you got.
As ?rexexp does say
(Note that the
brackets in these class names are part of the symbolic names
Aaargh, sorry. I thought it might be to do with Australian English...
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> That is correct: I suspect you meant the character class [[:upper:]]
>
>> grep( '[[:upper:]]', letters, val=TRUE) character(0)
>
> You asked for matches amongst :upper:, and that is what you got.
> A
14 matches
Mail list logo
