I never got a response from pcalg's maintainer, so I thought I'd
publisher a patch here that allows you to specify optional
node-labels; when no labels are specified, `plot' falls back on the
default behaviour of labelling nodes sequentially.
diff -Naur pcalg-orig/R/pcalg.R pcalg/R/pcalg.R
--- pcal
Full_Name: Mike Pacey
Version: 2.6.0
OS: SuSe Linux 9.3 x86_64
Submission from: (NULL) (194.80.32.10)
A "vanilla" version of R configures and compiles without a problem on my system.
Switching to using the PGI compiler configures correctly (see the values at the
bottom fo thismessage), but compi
I've no idea about the glob detection, but clearly this is the first
system that allegedly lacks glob that we have encountered: the file needs
to be
#if defined(HAVE_GLOB) || defined(Win32)
glob_t globbuf;
#endif
Have fixed that for 2.6.1 patched.
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr
Full_Name: Vincent Remacle
Version: 2.5.1
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (81.246.37.50)
> fit = vglm(x ~ 1, levy(idelta=2,igamma=2),trace=TRUE)
Error: cannot allocate vector of size 30.5 Mb
In addition: Warning messages:
1: NaNs produced in: log(x)
2: Reached total allocation of 1015Mb
Full_Name: Tomas Larsson
Version: 2.6.0
OS: Windows XP
Submission from: (NULL) (198.208.251.24)
This is not a bug, it is a performance issue but I think it should have an easy
fix.
I have a large matrix (about 2,000,000 by 20), when I type colnames(x) it takes
a long time to get the result. How
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Tomas Larsson
> Version: 2.6.0
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (198.208.251.24)
>
>
> This is not a bug, it is a performance issue but I think it should have an
> easy
> fix.
>
> I have a large matrix (about 2,000,000 by 20), when I type colnam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Full_Name: Vincent Remacle
> Version: 2.5.1
Please see the FAQs on how to report bugs. R-2.5.1 is two releases older
than required.
> OS: Windows XP
> Submission from: (NULL) (81.246.37.50)
>
>
>> fit = vglm(x ~ 1, levy(idelta=2,igamma=2),trace=TRUE)
- What is
Hi,
When writing a DCF file one record at a time, the records used
to be separated by an empty line in R-2.5, but not in R-2.6:
x <- data.frame(aa=letters[1:3], ii=1:3)
With R-2.5:
> x <- data.frame(aa=letters[1:3], ii=1:3)
> for (i in seq_len(nrow(x))) write.dcf(x[i, ,drop=FALSE])
aa:
