I'm probably not the first with this idea so I guess that there's a
complex issue behind it but since I couldn't find an answer I just
though to ask:
Wouldn't it be nice to have color coded objects as output of ls()
statement? Functions of one color and rest with other (at least). So
when I issue
For the record: The reason I used attr(myfun, "source") = FALSE, is that I
misread the example 'Tidying R Code' in 'Writing R Extensions', which calls
for attr(myfun, "source") = NULL.
Somehow setting 'source' to FALSE seems more natural to me than
setting it to NULL.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I a
On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For the record: The reason I used attr(myfun, "source") = FALSE, is that I
> misread the example 'Tidying R Code' in 'Writing R Extensions', which calls
> for attr(myfun, "source") = NULL.
>
> Somehow setting 'source' to FALSE seems more natural to m
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007, Gasper Cankar wrote:
> I'm probably not the first with this idea so I guess that there's a
> complex issue behind it but since I couldn't find an answer I just
> though to ask:
>
> Wouldn't it be nice to have color coded objects as output of ls()
> statement? Functions of one
Unfortunately, the problem is the way the R output is set up---there's
no portable way (at the moment) to tag output with different
attributes.
On Nov 21, 2007 4:11 AM, Gasper Cankar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm probably not the first with this idea so I guess that there's a
> complex issue be
