I'm resending this after a decent interval of 20 days -- any
opinions? Should I file it as a bug report? Is it my mistake?
cheers
Ben Bolker
Original Message
Subject:buglet (?) in de.restore()
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2007 13:29:33 -0400
From: Ben Bolker <[EMAIL
On 9/10/2007 8:47 AM, Ben Bolker wrote:
> I'm resending this after a decent interval of 20 days -- any
> opinions? Should I file it as a bug report? Is it my mistake?
I think a bug report is in order.
>
> cheers
> Ben Bolker
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: bu
Ben Bolker wrote:
> I'm resending this after a decent interval of 20 days -- any
> opinions? Should I file it as a bug report? Is it my mistake?
>
It just slipped through the cracks, I suppose. I think it looks like a
buglet -- the [[1]] in dimnames(args[[i]])[[1]] doesn't make sense
unless
Dear all,
I found the following behaviour with pacf() in the multivariate case,
set.seed(10)
x <- rnorm(1000,sd=1)
y <- rnorm(1000,sd=1)
pacf(ts(cbind(x,y)),plot=FALSE,lag.max=10)
Partial autocorrelations of series 'cbind(x, y)', by lag
, , x
x y
0.047 ( 1)0.000 ( -1
Thanks for the note.
Could you give me more info on the "small failures on stopping cluster"?
I don't currently have a windows system I can test this on so I can't
fold it into the snow release yet. But hopefully I can in the next
month or so. I may get back in touch at that point.
Meanwhile I
This is a test posting to R-devel used to
determine why some postings are dropped.
This one avoids mentioning the name of
an operating system that may trigger a junk
reaction.
Please ignore.
DS
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch
